[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/2] drm/i915: Use mul_u32_u32() more
Ville Syrjala
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Mon Apr 8 15:27:01 UTC 2019
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
We have a lot of '(u64)foo * bar' everywhere. Replace with
mul_u32_u32() to avoid gcc failing to use a regular 32x32->64
multiply for this.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h | 6 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 10 +++++-----
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c | 4 ++--
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 2 +-
4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h
index 591dd89ba7af..6621595fe74c 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_fixed.h
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static inline u32 mul_round_up_u32_fixed16(u32 val, uint_fixed_16_16_t mul)
{
u64 tmp;
- tmp = (u64)val * mul.val;
+ tmp = mul_u32_u32(val, mul.val);
tmp = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, 1 << 16);
WARN_ON(tmp > U32_MAX);
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ static inline uint_fixed_16_16_t mul_fixed16(uint_fixed_16_16_t val,
{
u64 tmp;
- tmp = (u64)val.val * mul.val;
+ tmp = mul_u32_u32(val.val, mul.val);
tmp = tmp >> 16;
return clamp_u64_to_fixed16(tmp);
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@ static inline uint_fixed_16_16_t mul_u32_fixed16(u32 val, uint_fixed_16_16_t mul
{
u64 tmp;
- tmp = (u64)val * mul.val;
+ tmp = mul_u32_u32(val, mul.val);
return clamp_u64_to_fixed16(tmp);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index cb7f99618f02..f10ea27d1fc8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ int chv_calc_dpll_params(int refclk, struct dpll *clock)
clock->p = clock->p1 * clock->p2;
if (WARN_ON(clock->n == 0 || clock->p == 0))
return 0;
- clock->vco = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL((u64)refclk * clock->m,
+ clock->vco = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(mul_u32_u32(refclk, clock->m),
clock->n << 22);
clock->dot = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(clock->vco, clock->p);
@@ -935,8 +935,8 @@ chv_find_best_dpll(const struct intel_limit *limit,
clock.p = clock.p1 * clock.p2;
- m2 = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(((u64)target * clock.p *
- clock.n) << 22, refclk * clock.m1);
+ m2 = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST_ULL(mul_u32_u32(target, clock.p * clock.n) << 22,
+ refclk * clock.m1);
if (m2 > INT_MAX/clock.m1)
continue;
@@ -6871,7 +6871,7 @@ static u32 ilk_pipe_pixel_rate(const struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config)
if (WARN_ON(!pfit_w || !pfit_h))
return pixel_rate;
- pixel_rate = div_u64((u64)pixel_rate * pipe_w * pipe_h,
+ pixel_rate = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(pixel_rate, pipe_w * pipe_h),
pfit_w * pfit_h);
}
@@ -6991,7 +6991,7 @@ static void compute_m_n(unsigned int m, unsigned int n,
else
*ret_n = min_t(unsigned int, roundup_pow_of_two(n), DATA_LINK_N_MAX);
- *ret_m = div_u64((u64)m * *ret_n, n);
+ *ret_m = div_u64(mul_u32_u32(m, *ret_n), n);
intel_reduce_m_n_ratio(ret_m, ret_n);
}
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
index e01c057ce50b..29edc369920b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dpll_mgr.c
@@ -2741,11 +2741,11 @@ static bool icl_calc_mg_pll_state(struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
}
if (use_ssc) {
- tmp = (u64)dco_khz * 47 * 32;
+ tmp = mul_u32_u32(dco_khz, 47 * 32);
do_div(tmp, refclk_khz * m1div * 10000);
ssc_stepsize = tmp;
- tmp = (u64)dco_khz * 1000;
+ tmp = mul_u32_u32(dco_khz, 1000);
ssc_steplen = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(tmp, 32 * 2 * 32);
} else {
ssc_stepsize = 0;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
index bba477e62a12..31c03673697e 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
@@ -675,7 +675,7 @@ static unsigned int intel_wm_method1(unsigned int pixel_rate,
{
u64 ret;
- ret = (u64)pixel_rate * cpp * latency;
+ ret = mul_u32_u32(pixel_rate, cpp * latency);
ret = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(ret, 10000);
return ret;
--
2.21.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list