[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915/sdvo: Check that we have space for the infoframe

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Tue Apr 9 21:08:21 UTC 2019


Quoting Ville Syrjälä (2019-04-09 20:59:43)
> On Tue, Apr 09, 2019 at 08:46:42PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Ville Syrjala (2019-04-09 15:40:51)
> > > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Before we go writing the infoframe let's make sure we have
> > > the space for it. Not that it really matters since the write
> > > loop would just terminate early in that case.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c | 3 +++
> > >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > > index 7f64352a3413..1e0102f1710f 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_sdvo.c
> > > @@ -970,6 +970,9 @@ static bool intel_sdvo_write_infoframe(struct intel_sdvo *intel_sdvo,
> > >                                   &hbuf_size, 1))
> > >                 return false;
> > >  
> > > +       if (hbuf_size < length)
> > > +               return false;
> > > +
> > 
> > Maybe after reporting the hbuf_size and length in the following
> > DRM_DEBUG_KMS?
> 
> Yes, that does seem more sensible. Avoids the off by one as well.

Ok, predictive
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list