[Intel-gfx] [PATCH libdrm] headers: Sync with drm-next

[Eric Engestrom]

On Wednesday, 2019-04-10 21:49:33 -0400, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 9, 2019 at 8:27 AM Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at intel.com> wrote:
> > > > diff --git a/include/drm/msm_drm.h b/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > > index c06d0a5..91a16b3 100644
> > > > --- a/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > > +++ b/include/drm/msm_drm.h
> > > > @@ -105,14 +105,24 @@ struct drm_msm_gem_new {
> > > >     __u32 handle;         /* out */
> > > >  };
> > > >
> > > > -#define MSM_INFO_IOVA      0x01
> > > > -
> > > > -#define MSM_INFO_FLAGS (MSM_INFO_IOVA)
> > > > +/* Get or set GEM buffer info.  The requested value can be passed
> > > > + * directly in 'value', or for data larger than 64b 'value' is a
> > > > + * pointer to userspace buffer, with 'len' specifying the number of
> > > > + * bytes copied into that buffer.  For info returned by pointer,
> > > > + * calling the GEM_INFO ioctl with null 'value' will return the
> > > > + * required buffer size in 'len'
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_OFFSET        0x00   /* get mmap() offset, returned by value */
> > > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_IOVA  0x01   /* get iova, returned by value */
> > > > +#define MSM_INFO_SET_NAME  0x02   /* set the debug name (by pointer) */
> > > > +#define MSM_INFO_GET_NAME  0x03   /* get debug name, returned by pointer */
> > > >
> > > >  struct drm_msm_gem_info {
> > > >     __u32 handle;         /* in */
> > > > -   __u32 flags;          /* in - combination of MSM_INFO_* flags */
> > > > -   __u64 offset;         /* out, mmap() offset or iova */
> > > > +   __u32 info;           /* in - one of MSM_INFO_* */
> > > > +   __u64 value;          /* in or out */
> > > > +   __u32 len;            /* in or out */
> > > > +   __u32 pad;
> >
> > freedreno/msm/msm_bo.c needs to be updated to reflect those changes.
> 
> 
> I think you can just rename flags->info and offset->value, the rest of
> the struct should be zero-initialized.. if in doubt you can check
> $mesa/src/freedreno/drm/msm_bo.c
> 
> side-note:  the libdrm_freedreno code was folded into mesa in 19.0, so
> at *some* point we can probably disable libdrm_freedreno build by
> default.

Right now, freedreno's `auto` enables it by default on arm and disables it on
everything else.

I always enable everything to at least build-test it, but Ayan was using
the defaults which is why he didn't see this issue at first.

Btw, the GitLab CI builds everything, so it hopefully won't bitrot unnoticed.

> (I'd kinda still like to keep the code around for some misc
> standalone tools I have, but that is the sort of thing where I can fix
> libdrm if it gets broken).  When to switch to disabled by default I
> guess comes down to how long we want to support mesa 18.x with latest
> libdrm??  Maybe after 19.1, since (selfishly motivated) that gives me
> a long enough window back in case I find myself needing to bisect for
> some regression..