[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [RFT i-g-t 6/6] test: perf_pmu: use the gem_engine_topology library

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Thu Apr 11 13:40:45 UTC 2019


Quoting Andi Shyti (2019-04-11 14:01:01)
> On Thu, Apr 11, 2019 at 01:32:03PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-04-11 13:26:54)
> > > From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at intel.com>
> > > 
> > > Replace the legacy for_each_engine* defines with the ones
> > > implemented in the gem_engine_topology library.
> > > 
> > > Use whenever possible gem_engine_can_store_dword() that checks
> > > class instead of flags.
> > > 
> > > Now the __for_each_engine_class_instance and
> > > for_each_engine_class_instance are unused, remove them.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com>
> > > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> > 
> > I see a lot of new gem_context_create(), but not gem_require_contexts().
> 
> gem_require_contexts() should go on top of engine_topology.

engine_topology shouldn't require contexts per se, as we should be able
to quite happily modify the engine map for Pineview. To what purpose,
we do not ask!

Just be careful you don't legacy tests.
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list