[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/50] drm/i915: Stop retiring along engine
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Apr 12 08:54:08 UTC 2019
We no longer track the execution order along the engine and so no longer
need to enforce ordering of retire along the engine.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c | 128 +++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 76 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
index fad1ea481bc1..3f3a6c0c8363 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_request.c
@@ -183,72 +183,23 @@ static void free_capture_list(struct i915_request *request)
}
}
-static void __retire_engine_request(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- struct i915_request *rq)
-{
- GEM_TRACE("%s(%s) fence %llx:%lld, current %d\n",
- __func__, engine->name,
- rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
- hwsp_seqno(rq));
-
- GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(rq));
-
- local_irq_disable();
-
- spin_lock(&engine->timeline.lock);
- GEM_BUG_ON(!list_is_first(&rq->link, &engine->timeline.requests));
- list_del_init(&rq->link);
- spin_unlock(&engine->timeline.lock);
-
- spin_lock(&rq->lock);
- i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
- if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
- dma_fence_signal_locked(&rq->fence);
- if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &rq->fence.flags))
- i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(rq);
- if (rq->waitboost) {
- GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters));
- atomic_dec(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters);
- }
- spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
-
- local_irq_enable();
-}
-
-static void __retire_engine_upto(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
- struct i915_request *rq)
-{
- struct i915_request *tmp;
-
- if (list_empty(&rq->link))
- return;
-
- do {
- tmp = list_first_entry(&engine->timeline.requests,
- typeof(*tmp), link);
-
- GEM_BUG_ON(tmp->engine != engine);
- __retire_engine_request(engine, tmp);
- } while (tmp != rq);
-}
-
-static void i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *request)
+static bool i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *rq)
{
struct i915_active_request *active, *next;
- GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%lld, current %d\n",
- request->engine->name,
- request->fence.context, request->fence.seqno,
- hwsp_seqno(request));
+ lockdep_assert_held(&rq->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
+ if (!i915_request_completed(rq))
+ return false;
- lockdep_assert_held(&request->i915->drm.struct_mutex);
- GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&request->submit));
- GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_request_completed(request));
+ GEM_TRACE("%s fence %llx:%lld, current %d\n",
+ rq->engine->name,
+ rq->fence.context, rq->fence.seqno,
+ hwsp_seqno(rq));
- trace_i915_request_retire(request);
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_sw_fence_signaled(&rq->submit));
+ trace_i915_request_retire(rq);
- advance_ring(request);
- free_capture_list(request);
+ advance_ring(rq);
/*
* Walk through the active list, calling retire on each. This allows
@@ -260,7 +211,7 @@ static void i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *request)
* pass along the auxiliary information (to avoid dereferencing
* the node after the callback).
*/
- list_for_each_entry_safe(active, next, &request->active_list, link) {
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(active, next, &rq->active_list, link) {
/*
* In microbenchmarks or focusing upon time inside the kernel,
* we may spend an inordinate amount of time simply handling
@@ -276,18 +227,39 @@ static void i915_request_retire(struct i915_request *request)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&active->link);
RCU_INIT_POINTER(active->request, NULL);
- active->retire(active, request);
+ active->retire(active, rq);
+ }
+
+ local_irq_disable();
+
+ spin_lock(&rq->engine->timeline.lock);
+ list_del(&rq->link);
+ spin_unlock(&rq->engine->timeline.lock);
+
+ spin_lock(&rq->lock);
+ i915_request_mark_complete(rq);
+ if (!i915_request_signaled(rq))
+ dma_fence_signal_locked(&rq->fence);
+ if (test_bit(DMA_FENCE_FLAG_ENABLE_SIGNAL_BIT, &rq->fence.flags))
+ i915_request_cancel_breadcrumb(rq);
+ if (rq->waitboost) {
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!atomic_read(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters));
+ atomic_dec(&rq->i915->gt_pm.rps.num_waiters);
}
+ spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
+
+ local_irq_enable();
- i915_request_remove_from_client(request);
+ intel_context_exit(rq->hw_context);
+ intel_context_unpin(rq->hw_context);
- __retire_engine_upto(request->engine, request);
+ i915_request_remove_from_client(rq);
- intel_context_exit(request->hw_context);
- intel_context_unpin(request->hw_context);
+ free_capture_list(rq);
+ i915_sched_node_fini(&rq->sched);
+ i915_request_put(rq);
- i915_sched_node_fini(&request->sched);
- i915_request_put(request);
+ return true;
}
void i915_request_retire_upto(struct i915_request *rq)
@@ -309,9 +281,7 @@ void i915_request_retire_upto(struct i915_request *rq)
do {
tmp = list_first_entry(&ring->request_list,
typeof(*tmp), ring_link);
-
- i915_request_retire(tmp);
- } while (tmp != rq);
+ } while (i915_request_retire(tmp) && tmp != rq);
}
static void irq_execute_cb(struct irq_work *wrk)
@@ -593,12 +563,9 @@ static void ring_retire_requests(struct intel_ring *ring)
{
struct i915_request *rq, *rn;
- list_for_each_entry_safe(rq, rn, &ring->request_list, ring_link) {
- if (!i915_request_completed(rq))
+ list_for_each_entry_safe(rq, rn, &ring->request_list, ring_link)
+ if (!i915_request_retire(rq))
break;
-
- i915_request_retire(rq);
- }
}
static noinline struct i915_request *
@@ -613,6 +580,15 @@ request_alloc_slow(struct intel_context *ce, gfp_t gfp)
if (!gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp))
goto out;
+ /* Move our oldest request to the slab-cache (if not in use!) */
+ rq = list_first_entry(&ring->request_list, typeof(*rq), ring_link);
+ i915_request_retire(rq);
+
+ rq = kmem_cache_alloc(global.slab_requests,
+ gfp | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOWARN);
+ if (rq)
+ return rq;
+
/* Ratelimit ourselves to prevent oom from malicious clients */
rq = list_last_entry(&ring->request_list, typeof(*rq), ring_link);
cond_synchronize_rcu(rq->rcustate);
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list