[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/50] drm/i915: Introduce struct intel_wakeref
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Fri Apr 12 12:59:30 UTC 2019
On 12/04/2019 09:53, Chris Wilson wrote:
> For controlling runtime pm of the GT and engines, we would like to have
> a callback to do extra work the first time we wake up and the last time
> we drop the wakeref. This first/last access needs serialisation and so
> we encompass a mutex with the regular intel_wakeref_t tracker.
>
> v2: Drop the _once naming and report the errors.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc; Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile.header-test | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 3 +-
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c | 62 ++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 5 files changed, 199 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> index 40130cf5c003..233bad5e361f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ i915-y += i915_drv.o \
> intel_device_info.o \
> intel_pm.o \
> intel_runtime_pm.o \
> + intel_wakeref.o \
> intel_uncore.o
>
> # core library code
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile.header-test b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile.header-test
> index 96a5d90629ec..e6b3e7588860 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile.header-test
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile.header-test
> @@ -31,7 +31,8 @@ header_test := \
> intel_psr.h \
> intel_sdvo.h \
> intel_sprite.h \
> - intel_tv.h
> + intel_tv.h \
> + intel_wakeref.h
>
> quiet_cmd_header_test = HDRTEST $@
> cmd_header_test = echo "\#include \"$(<F)\"" > $@
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index fad5306f07da..62a7e91acd7f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@
> #include "intel_opregion.h"
> #include "intel_uc.h"
> #include "intel_uncore.h"
> +#include "intel_wakeref.h"
> #include "intel_wopcm.h"
>
> #include "i915_gem.h"
> @@ -134,8 +135,6 @@ bool i915_error_injected(void);
> __i915_printk(i915, i915_error_injected() ? KERN_DEBUG : KERN_ERR, \
> fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> -typedef depot_stack_handle_t intel_wakeref_t;
> -
> enum hpd_pin {
> HPD_NONE = 0,
> HPD_TV = HPD_NONE, /* TV is known to be unreliable */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..f4cfaa154303
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
> +/*
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#include "intel_drv.h"
> +#include "intel_wakeref.h"
> +
> +int __intel_wakeref_get_first(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + int (*fn)(struct intel_wakeref *wf))
> +{
> + /*
> + * Treat get/put as different subclasses, as we may need to run
> + * the put callback from under the shrinker and do not want to
> + * cross-contanimate that callback with any extra work performed
> + * upon acquiring the wakeref.
> + */
So you want to seralize the get/put callbacks but don't want lockdep to
see any chains resulting from that. Sounds worrying.
What if you moved them (callbacks) outside wf->mutex then and mandate
the callback pairs to serialize themselves?
> + mutex_lock_nested(&wf->mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
> + if (!atomic_read(&wf->count)) {
> + int err;
> +
> + wf->wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(i915);
> +
> + err = fn(wf);
> + if (unlikely(err)) {
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(i915, wf->wakeref);
> + mutex_unlock(&wf->mutex);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + smp_mb__before_atomic(); /* release wf->count */
These ones are like usually "What.." for me.
According to the docs this line would suggest you want some other memory
write to become visible before the atomic_inc below. Which one?
> + }
> + atomic_inc(&wf->count);
> + mutex_unlock(&wf->mutex);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int __intel_wakeref_put_last(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + int (*fn)(struct intel_wakeref *wf))
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = fn(wf);
> + if (likely(!err))
> + intel_runtime_pm_put(i915, wf->wakeref);
> + else
> + atomic_inc(&wf->count);
> + mutex_unlock(&wf->mutex);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
> +
> +void __intel_wakeref_init(struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + struct lock_class_key *key)
> +{
> + __mutex_init(&wf->mutex, "wakeref", key);
> + atomic_set(&wf->count, 0);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..a979d638344b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wakeref.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
> +/*
> + * SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
> + *
> + * Copyright © 2019 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef INTEL_WAKEREF_H
> +#define INTEL_WAKEREF_H
> +
> +#include <linux/atomic.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/stackdepot.h>
> +
> +struct drm_i915_private;
> +
> +typedef depot_stack_handle_t intel_wakeref_t;
> +
> +struct intel_wakeref {
> + atomic_t count;
> + struct mutex mutex;
> + intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
> +};
> +
> +void __intel_wakeref_init(struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + struct lock_class_key *key);
> +#define intel_wakeref_init(wf) do { \
> + static struct lock_class_key __key; \
> + \
> + __intel_wakeref_init((wf), &__key); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +int __intel_wakeref_get_first(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + int (*fn)(struct intel_wakeref *wf));
> +int __intel_wakeref_put_last(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + int (*fn)(struct intel_wakeref *wf));
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_wakeref_get: Acquire the wakeref
> + * @i915: the drm_i915_private device
> + * @wf: the wakeref
> + * @fn: callback for acquired the wakeref, called only on first acquire.
> + *
> + * Acquire a hold on the wakeref. The first user to do so, will acquire
> + * the runtime pm wakeref and then call the @fn underneath the wakeref
> + * mutex.
> + *
> + * Note that @fn is allowed to fail, in which case the runtime-pm wakeref
> + * will be released and the acquisition unwound, and an error reported.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 if the wakeref was acquired successfully, or a negative error
> + * code otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline int
> +intel_wakeref_get(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + int (*fn)(struct intel_wakeref *wf))
> +{
> + if (unlikely(!atomic_inc_not_zero(&wf->count)))
> + return __intel_wakeref_get_first(i915, wf, fn);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_wakeref_put: Release the wakeref
> + * @i915: the drm_i915_private device
> + * @wf: the wakeref
> + * @fn: callback for releasing the wakeref, called only on final release.
> + *
> + * Release our hold on the wakeref. When there are no more users,
> + * the runtime pm wakeref will be released after the @fn callback is called
> + * underneath the wakeref mutex.
> + *
> + * Note that @fn is allowed to fail, in which case the runtime-pm wakeref
> + * is retained and an error reported.
> + *
> + * Returns: 0 if the wakeref was released successfully, or a negative error
> + * code otherwise.
> + */
> +static inline int
> +intel_wakeref_put(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> + struct intel_wakeref *wf,
> + int (*fn)(struct intel_wakeref *wf))
> +{
> + if (atomic_dec_and_mutex_lock(&wf->count, &wf->mutex))
> + return __intel_wakeref_put_last(i915, wf, fn);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_wakeref_lock: Lock the wakeref (mutex)
> + * @wf: the wakeref
> + *
> + * Locks the wakeref to prevent it being acquired or released. New users
> + * can still adjust the counter, but the wakeref itself (and callback)
> + * cannot be acquired or released.
> + */
> +static inline void
> +intel_wakeref_lock(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> + __acquires(wf->mutex)
> +{
> + mutex_lock(&wf->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_wakeref_unlock: Unlock the wakeref
> + * @wf: the wakeref
> + *
> + * Releases a previously acquired intel_wakeref_lock().
> + */
> +static inline void
> +intel_wakeref_unlock(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> + __releases(wf->mutex)
> +{
> + mutex_unlock(&wf->mutex);
> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * intel_wakeref_active: Query whether the wakeref is currently held
> + * @wf: the wakeref
> + *
> + * Returns: true if the wakeref is currently held.
> + */
> +static inline bool
> +intel_wakeref_active(struct intel_wakeref *wf)
> +{
> + return atomic_read(&wf->count);
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* INTEL_WAKEREF_H */
>
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list