[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v7] drm/i915/icl: Fix clockgating issue when using scalers
Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Tue Apr 16 14:14:04 UTC 2019
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 03:55:19PM -0700, Radhakrishna Sripada wrote:
> Fixes the clock-gating issue when pipe scaling is enabled.
> (Lineage #2006604312)
>
> V2: Fix typo in headline(Chris)
> Handle the non double buffered nature of the register(Ville)
> V3: Fix checkpatch warning. BAT failure for V2 on gen3 looks unrelated.
> V4: Split the icl and skl wa's(Ville)
> V5: Split the checks for icl and skl(Ville)
> V6: Correct the flipped checks in intel_pre_plane_update(Ville)
> V7: Use enum for pipe and extend the WA for plane scalers(Ville)
>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
> Cc: Clint Taylor <clinton.a.taylor at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Radhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 3bd40a4a6739..6f68d039ab47 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -476,6 +476,7 @@ static const struct intel_limit intel_limits_bxt = {
> .p2 = { .p2_slow = 1, .p2_fast = 20 },
> };
>
> +/* WA Display #0827: Gen9:all */
> static void
> skl_wa_827(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int pipe, bool enable)
> {
> @@ -489,6 +490,19 @@ skl_wa_827(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, int pipe, bool enable)
> ~(DUPS1_GATING_DIS | DUPS2_GATING_DIS));
> }
>
> +/* Wa_2006604312:icl */
> +static void
> +icl_wa_scalerclkgating(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, enum pipe pipe,
> + bool enable)
> +{
> + if (enable)
> + I915_WRITE(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe),
> + I915_READ(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe)) | DPFR_GATING_DIS);
> + else
> + I915_WRITE(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe),
> + I915_READ(CLKGATE_DIS_PSL(pipe)) & ~DPFR_GATING_DIS);
> +}
> +
> static bool
> needs_modeset(const struct drm_crtc_state *state)
> {
> @@ -5505,6 +5519,18 @@ static bool needs_nv12_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> return false;
> }
>
> +static bool needs_scalerclk_wa(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + /* Wa_2006604312:icl */
> + if (IS_ICELAKE(dev_priv) &&
> + (crtc_state->pch_pfit.enabled ||
I don't think we need the pfit check anymore. scaler_users should
account for that?
> + crtc_state->scaler_state.scaler_users > 0))
> + return true;
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> static void intel_post_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> {
> struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(old_crtc_state->base.crtc);
> @@ -5538,11 +5564,13 @@ static void intel_post_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state)
> intel_post_enable_primary(&crtc->base, pipe_config);
> }
>
> - /* Display WA 827 */
> if (needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> - !needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config)) {
> + !needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> skl_wa_827(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, false);
> - }
> +
> + if (needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> + !needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> + icl_wa_scalerclkgating(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, false);
> }
>
> static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> @@ -5579,9 +5607,13 @@ static void intel_pre_plane_update(struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
>
> /* Display WA 827 */
> if (!needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> - needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config)) {
> + needs_nv12_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> skl_wa_827(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, true);
> - }
> +
> + /* Wa_2006604312:icl */
> + if (!needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, old_crtc_state) &&
> + needs_scalerclk_wa(dev_priv, pipe_config))
> + icl_wa_scalerclkgating(dev_priv, crtc->pipe, true);
>
> /*
> * Vblank time updates from the shadow to live plane control register
> --
> 2.20.0.rc2.7.g965798d1f299
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list