[Intel-gfx] [patch V2 09/29] mm/kasan: Simplify stacktrace handling

[Andrey Ryabinin]

On 4/18/19 11:41 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Replace the indirection through struct stack_trace by using the storage
> array based interfaces.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov at google.com>
> Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin at virtuozzo.com>
> Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider at google.com>
> Cc: kasan-dev at googlegroups.com
> Cc: linux-mm at kvack.org

Acked-by: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin at virtuozzo.com>

>  
>  static inline depot_stack_handle_t save_stack(gfp_t flags)
>  {
>  	unsigned long entries[KASAN_STACK_DEPTH];
> -	struct stack_trace trace = {
> -		.nr_entries = 0,
> -		.entries = entries,
> -		.max_entries = KASAN_STACK_DEPTH,
> -		.skip = 0
> -	};
> +	unsigned int nr_entries;
>  
> -	save_stack_trace(&trace);
> -	filter_irq_stacks(&trace);
> -
> -	return depot_save_stack(&trace, flags);
> +	nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 0);
> +	nr_entries = filter_irq_stacks(entries, nr_entries);
> +	return stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, flags);

Suggestion for further improvement:

stack_trace_save() shouldn't unwind beyond irq entry point so we wouldn't need filter_irq_stacks().
Probably all call sites doesn't care about random stack above irq entry point, so it doesn't
make sense to spend resources on unwinding non-irq stack from interrupt first an filtering out it later.

It would improve performance of stack_trace_save() called from interrupt and fix page_owner which feed unfiltered
stack to stack_depot_save(). Random non-irq part kills the benefit of using the stack_deopt_save().