[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.CHECKPATCH: warning for Refactor to expand subslice mask
Patchwork
patchwork at emeril.freedesktop.org
Fri Apr 19 00:07:08 UTC 2019
== Series Details ==
Series: Refactor to expand subslice mask
URL : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/59742/
State : warning
== Summary ==
$ dim checkpatch origin/drm-tip
c768f68e461e drm/i915: Use local variable for SSEU info in GETPARAM ioctl
d85bb21514db drm/i915: Add macro for SSEU stride calculation
55c847acc9c8 drm/i915: Move calculation of subslices per slice to new function
79c37be2a181 drm/i915: Expand subslice mask
-:300: CHECK:PARENTHESIS_ALIGNMENT: Alignment should match open parenthesis
#300: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.c:178:
+static void set_sseu_info(struct sseu_dev_info *sseu, u8 max_slices,
+ u8 max_subslices, u8 max_eus_per_subslice)
-:714: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'sseu__' - possible side-effects?
#714: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:535:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:714: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'slice__' may be better as '(slice__)' to avoid precedence issues
#714: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:535:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:714: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'subslice__' - possible side-effects?
#714: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:535:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:714: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_PRECEDENCE: Macro argument 'subslice__' may be better as '(subslice__)' to avoid precedence issues
#714: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:535:
+#define instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv__, sseu__, slice__, subslice__) \
+ ((IS_GEN(dev_priv__, 7) ? \
+ 1 : (sseu__)->subslice_mask[slice__ * (sseu__)->ss_stride + \
+ subslice__ / BITS_PER_BYTE]) & \
+ BIT(subslice__ % BITS_PER_BYTE)) \
+
-:720: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'dev_priv_' - possible side-effects?
#720: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:541:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
-:720: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'sseu_' - possible side-effects?
#720: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:541:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
-:720: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'slice_' - possible side-effects?
#720: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:541:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
-:720: CHECK:MACRO_ARG_REUSE: Macro argument reuse 'subslice_' - possible side-effects?
#720: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_engine_types.h:541:
+#define for_each_instdone_slice_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_) \
+ for ((slice_) = 0, (subslice_) = 0; (slice_) < I915_MAX_SLICES; \
+ (subslice_) = ((subslice_) + 1) < I915_MAX_SUBSLICES ? (subslice_) + 1 : 0, \
+ (slice_) += ((subslice_) == 0)) \
+ for_each_if(instdone_has_slice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice) && \
+ instdone_has_subslice(dev_priv_, sseu_, slice_, subslice_)) \
total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 9 checks, 662 lines checked
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list