[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Move pm_imr and pm_ier to intel_irc.
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Thu Apr 25 22:55:28 UTC 2019
On Thu, Apr 25, 2019 at 11:16:33PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Rodrigo Vivi (2019-04-25 22:50:37)
> > No functional change. But by making those bits together
> > we will be able to convert many functions to pass
> > intel_irq instead of i915_private or uncore.
> > For gen8+ "gt_" prefix would be better than pm_ on them
> > since these regs include more stuff then PM, but let's
> > keep for legacy reasons.
> I still disagree with this direction and would like to get the
> conflicting bug fixes reviewed first.
Sorry, I missunderstood you then...
I thought you were okay with intel_irq as long as we didn't
move rps related irq to it.
I still want to split de from gt irqs though, just started
from the easy less risk place to start.
About the bugs you mentioned you mean like this:
or what else do you have in mind that I'm missing?
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
More information about the Intel-gfx