[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm/i915/icl: Whitelist GEN9_SLICE_COMMON_ECO_CHICKEN1
anuj.phogat at intel.com
Fri Apr 26 16:58:30 UTC 2019
Mesa now applies this WA on ICL and we're not seeing any regressions in CI.
I tested Mesa with and without this patch applied to kernel. I don't see any
performance impact to Manhattan from GfxBench5. I'm little surprised to
see it's not really helping benchmark performance in Mesa. I'll dig bit more
to figure out a possible explanation. I haven't tried any other benchmarks
with this patch.
On 04/26/2019 01:31 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
> + Anuj
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-04-26 11:13:58)
>> On 18/04/2019 18:06, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>> WaEnableStateCacheRedirectToCS context workaround configures the L3 cache
>>> to benefit 3d workloads but media has different requirements.
>>> Remove the workaround and whitelist the register to allow any userspace
>>> configure the behaviour to their liking.
>>> * Remove the workaround apart from adding the whitelist.
>>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>>> Cc: kevin.ma at intel.com
>>> Cc: xiaogang.li at intel.com
>> Acked-by: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
>> Mesa commits :
>> commit db5b372bb9f5a0dfea86618f8f9832f25d9eaf71 (anv)
>> commit eaadb62c9ea98f841d7ffc26c14341abdf84d2d6 (i965)
>> commit d1be67db39463b48369cb71979ed18662b2c157e (iris)
> Could somebody confirm that applying this patch does not cause hangs in
> older mesa, and the performance drop (if any) is insignificant?
> Best Regards,
More information about the Intel-gfx