[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

[Daniel Vetter]

On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:40 AM Emil Velikov <emil.l.velikov at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 08:34, Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 2:34 AM Dave Airlie <airlied at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 20:47, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Hi Daniel, Dave,
> > > >
> > > > Here is the first (and pretty late) drm-misc-next PR.
> > > >
> > > > It's pretty big due to the lateness, but there's nothing really major
> > > > showing up. It's pretty much the usual bunch of reworks, fixes, and
> > > > new helpers being introduced.
> > > >
> > >
> > > dim: 415d2e9e0757 ("Revert "drm/gem: Rename drm_gem_dumb_map_offset()
> > > to drm_gem_map_offset()""): mandatory review missing.
> > > dim: be855382bacb ("Revert "drm/panfrost: Use drm_gem_map_offset()""):
> > > mandatory review missing.
> > > dim: e4eee93d2577 ("drm/vgem: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"):
> > > mandatory review missing.
> > > dim: 88209d2c5035 ("drm/msm: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"):
> > > mandatory review missing.
> > > dim: ccdae4257569 ("drm/nouveau: remove open-coded drm_invalid_op()"):
> > > mandatory review missing.
> > >
> > > Pretty sure review in drm-misc-next is a rule. I don't even see acks
> > > on most of these.
> >
> > Yes. I guess for reverts it's not cool, but also not the worst. Still
> > better to get someone to ack, heck I can pull that off for emergency
> > reverts with a few pings on irc, and the 2 reverts landed much later.
> > But for normal patches it's definitely not ok at all. Also only
> > possible if people bypass the tooling, or override the tooling with
> > the -f flag to force a push.
> >
> > Rob, Emil, what's up here?
> >
> I've got was an "Thanks" [1] from Ben on the nouveau patch - so I merged it.
> The msm and vgem ones are my bad - must have missed those one
> inbetween the other patches.

The thing is, dim push shouldn't allow you to do that. And the patches
have clearly been applied with dim apply (or at least you added the
Link), unlike Rob who seems to just have pushed the revert.

If you used git push directly, then I guess you just volunteered to
implement Daniel Stone's idea to enforce dim tooling. Adding Daniel,
since I guess that was just an irc chat.
-Daniel

> Will double-check and follow-up on all of those.
>
> -Emil
> [1] https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/2019-May/218823.html


--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch