[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/7] drm/i915: Don't try to partition WOPCM without GuC firmware
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Wed Aug 7 17:31:59 UTC 2019
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2019-08-07 18:00:31)
> For meaningful WOPCM partitioning we need GuC (and optionally HuC)
> firmware size(s) and we shouldn't just rely on GuC support flag,
> as we might fail to fetch GuC firmware and it's size will be 0
> and all calculations will be just wrong/useless.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> index 4c22143ee84f..5e5c3fd3472d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ void intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
> u32 guc_wopcm_rsvd;
> int err;
>
> - if (!USES_GUC(i915))
> + if (!guc_fw_size)
> return;
It looks like the calculations with huc_fw_size=0 are fine, just hope
the fw agrees.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list