[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-misc-next

[Maxime Ripard]

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 02:30:25PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 2:02 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 06:11:32PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 06:01:46PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 10:33:53AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, 3 Aug 2019 at 20:47, Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Hi Daniel, Dave,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Here is the first (and pretty late) drm-misc-next PR.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > It's pretty big due to the lateness, but there's nothing really major
> > > > > > showing up. It's pretty much the usual bunch of reworks, fixes, and
> > > > > > new helpers being introduced.
> > > > >
> > > > > dim: 415d2e9e0757 ("Revert "drm/gem: Rename drm_gem_dumb_map_offset()
> > > > > to drm_gem_map_offset()""): mandatory review missing.
> > > > > dim: be855382bacb ("Revert "drm/panfrost: Use drm_gem_map_offset()""):
> > > > > mandatory review missing.
> > > > > dim: e4eee93d2577 ("drm/vgem: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"):
> > > > > mandatory review missing.
> > > > > dim: 88209d2c5035 ("drm/msm: drop DRM_AUTH usage from the driver"):
> > > > > mandatory review missing.
> > > > > dim: ccdae4257569 ("drm/nouveau: remove open-coded drm_invalid_op()"):
> > > > > mandatory review missing.
> > > > >
> > > > > Pretty sure review in drm-misc-next is a rule. I don't even see acks
> > > > > on most of these.
> > > >
> > > > Ugh, sorry for that. I guess I'm still pretty new to the
> > > > maintainer-side of dim, which commands did you use to check that?
> > >
> > > dim apply-pull does this. If all committers use the tooling as they should
> > > they shouldn't be able to push patches which violate anything here, that's
> > > why dim request-pull doesn't reject.
> >
> > Yeah, sure, I meant to ask if there was anyway to check this before
> > sending the PR on our end.
>
> I think we'd need to create new command. Or maybe we should integrate
> it as part of the pull request generation, as an information/warning
> that there might be problems you need to explain. Want to write a dim
> patch?

I just sent something that should catch that, but considering my
dim-fu, you probably want to review it :)

Maxime

--
Maxime Ripard, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20190808/0f7eff66/attachment.sig>