[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 06/34] drm/i915: convert put_page() to put_user_page*()

[John Hubbard]

On 8/2/19 11:48 AM, John Hubbard wrote:
> On 8/2/19 2:19 AM, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
>> Quoting john.hubbard at gmail.com (2019-08-02 05:19:37)
>>> From: John Hubbard <jhubbard at nvidia.com>
...
> In order to deal with the merge problem, I'll drop this patch from my series,
> and I'd recommend that the drm-intel-next take the following approach:

Actually, I just pulled the latest linux.git, and there are a few changes:

> 
> 1) For now, s/put_page/put_user_page/ in i915_gem_userptr_put_pages(),
> and fix up the set_page_dirty() --> set_page_dirty_lock() issue, like this
> (based against linux.git):
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
> index 528b61678334..94721cc0093b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_userptr.c
> @@ -664,10 +664,10 @@ i915_gem_userptr_put_pages(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
> 
>         for_each_sgt_page(page, sgt_iter, pages) {
>                 if (obj->mm.dirty)
> -                       set_page_dirty(page);
> +                       set_page_dirty_lock(page);

I see you've already applied this fix to your tree, in linux.git already.

> 
>                 mark_page_accessed(page);
> -               put_page(page);
> +               put_user_page(page);

But this conversion still needs doing. So I'll repost a patch that only does 
this (plus the other call sites). 

That can go in via either your tree, or Andrew's -mm tree, without generating
any conflicts.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA