[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/selftests: Prevent the timeslice expiring during suppression tests
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Sat Aug 10 17:57:02 UTC 2019
When testing whether we prevent suppressing preemption, it helps to
avoid a time slice expiring prematurely.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111108
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
index 91f1c9012489..b797be1627e9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/selftest_lrc.c
@@ -913,6 +913,8 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg)
goto err_wedged;
}
+ /* Keep postponing the timer to avoid premature slicing */
+ mod_timer(&engine->execlists.timer, jiffies + HZ);
for (depth = 0; depth < 8; depth++) {
rq_b = spinner_create_request(&b.spin,
b.ctx, engine,
@@ -938,7 +940,8 @@ static int live_suppress_self_preempt(void *arg)
igt_spinner_end(&a.spin);
if (engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count) {
- pr_err("Preemption recorded x%d, depth %d; should have been suppressed!\n",
+ pr_err("Preemption on %s recorded x%d, depth %d; should have been suppressed!\n",
+ engine->name,
engine->execlists.preempt_hang.count,
depth);
err = -EINVAL;
--
2.23.0.rc1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list