[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/uc: Update copyright and license
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Aug 12 09:36:22 UTC 2019
Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2019-08-12 10:29:35)
> Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.c | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc.h | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.c | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ads.h | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.c | 22 ++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_ct.h | 22 ++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.c | 22 ++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.h | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fwif.h | 23 +++---------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.c | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_log.h | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_reg.h | 24 +++----------------
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.c | 21 +---------------
> .../gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_submission.h | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.c | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc.h | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c | 5 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.h | 5 ++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.h | 24 +++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.c | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc_fw.h | 23 ++----------------
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c | 21 +---------------
> 23 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 441 deletions(-)
There were all MIT, now marked with SPDX: MIT.
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
I don't like the SPDX breaking coding style, but it seems it is just me.
However, you did alternate between /* SPDX */ and // SPDX with no rhyme
or reason I could see.
-Chris
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list