[Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to apply to v5.3-rc2

[Jani Nikula]

On Mon, 29 Jul 2019, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> wrote:
> The following commits have been marked as Cc: stable or fixing something
> in v5.3-rc2 or earlier, but failed to cherry-pick to
> drm-intel-fixes. Please see if they are worth backporting, and please do
> so if they are.
>
> Failed to cherry-pick:
> 18398904ca9e ("drm/i915: Only recover active engines")
> 092be382a260 ("drm/i915: Lift intel_engines_resume() to callers")

These have been backported and merged.

> fff8102aaed5 ("drm/i915/execlists: Process interrupted context on reset")
> 6c2b0103ad92 ("drm/i915: Fix and improve MCR selection logic")

These are still open.

This is a new one:

d8af05ff38ae ("drm/i915: Allow sharing the idle-barrier from other kernel requests")

> Cherry-pick fine but fail to build (*):
> 2a8db563311a ("drm/i915: Use maximum write flush for pwrite_gtt")

This is a new one:

576f05865581 ("drm/i915: Flush extra hard after writing relocations through the GTT")

>
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
>
> (*)
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_fast’:
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:653:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes’; did you mean ‘i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
>     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>     i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:653:39: error: ‘struct i915_address_space’ has no member named ‘gt’
>     intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
>                                        ^
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:682:37: error: ‘struct i915_address_space’ has no member named ‘gt’
>   intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
>                                      ^

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center