[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 33/40] drm/i915/tgl/perf: use the same oa ctx_id format as icl

[Lionel Landwerlin]

On 17/08/2019 11:38, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> From: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
>
> Compared to Icelake, Tigerlake's MAX_CONTEXT_HW_ID is smaller by one, but
> since we just use the upper 32 bits of the lrc_desc, it's guaranteed OA
> will use the correct one.
>
> Cc: Lionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 3 ++-
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> index e42b86827d6b..2c9f46e12622 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c
> @@ -1299,7 +1299,8 @@ static int oa_get_render_ctx_id(struct i915_perf_stream *stream)
>   		}
>   		break;
>   
> -	case 11: {
> +	case 11:
> +	case 12: {
>   		stream->specific_ctx_id_mask =
>   			((1U << GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_WIDTH) - 1) << (GEN11_SW_CTX_ID_SHIFT - 32) |
>   			((1U << GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_WIDTH) - 1) << (GEN11_ENGINE_INSTANCE_SHIFT - 32) |


This looks correct, I just have one question I don't remember the answer 
to :

With GuC on Gen11+ we get the same value as when i915 builds up the 
upper 32bits of the LRC descriptor using the hw_id?


Thanks,


-Lionel