[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 3/3] drm/ttm: remove ttm_bo_wait_unreserved

Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Wed Aug 21 14:10:23 UTC 2019


On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 3:16 PM Thomas Hellström (VMware)
<thomas_os at shipmail.org> wrote:
>
> On 8/20/19 4:53 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > With nouveau fixed all ttm-using drives have the correct nesting of
> > mmap_sem vs dma_resv, and we can just lock the buffer.
> >
> > Assuming I didn't screw up anything with my audit of course.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> > Cc: Christian Koenig <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> > Cc: Huang Rui <ray.huang at amd.com>
> > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel at redhat.com>
> > Cc: "VMware Graphics" <linux-graphics-maintainer at vmware.com>
> > Cc: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom at vmware.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c    | 34 ---------------------------------
> >   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c | 26 +------------------------
> >   include/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_api.h    |  1 -
> >   3 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 60 deletions(-)
> >
> >
> > +     dma_resv_lock(bo->base.resv, NULL);
>
> interruptible, or at least killable. (IIRC think killable is the right
> choice in fault code, even if TTM initially implemented interruptible to
> get reasonable Xorg "silken mouse" latency).

I think interruptible is fine. I chickend out of that for v1 because I
always mix up the return code for _lock_interruptibl() :-)

I'll add that for the next version too.
-Daniel
-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list