[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/5] drm/i915/gtt: Add some range asserts

Mika Kuoppala mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com
Wed Aug 21 16:24:05 UTC 2019


Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> These should have been validated in the upper layers, but for sanity's
> sake, repeat them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index b06d1d9054ba..0b81e0b64393 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -965,8 +965,10 @@ static u64 __gen8_ppgtt_clear(struct i915_address_space * const vm,
>  	const struct i915_page_scratch * const scratch = &vm->scratch[lvl];
>  	unsigned int idx, len;
>  
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(end > vm->total >> GEN8_PTE_SHIFT);

I am having thoughts to clean all underlying handling to
use page indexes consistently...

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>

> +
>  	len = gen8_pd_range(start, end, lvl--, &idx);
> -	DBG("%s(%p):{ lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d}\n",
> +	DBG("%s(%p):{ lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d }\n",
>  	    __func__, vm, lvl + 1, start, end,
>  	    idx, len, atomic_read(px_used(pd)));
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!len || len >= atomic_read(px_used(pd)));
> @@ -992,7 +994,7 @@ static u64 __gen8_ppgtt_clear(struct i915_address_space * const vm,
>  			u64 *vaddr;
>  
>  			count = gen8_pt_count(start, end);
> -			DBG("%s(%p):{ lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d} removing pte\n",
> +			DBG("%s(%p):{ lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d } removing pte\n",
>  			    __func__, vm, lvl, start, end,
>  			    gen8_pd_index(start, 0), count,
>  			    atomic_read(&pt->used));
> @@ -1020,6 +1022,7 @@ static void gen8_ppgtt_clear(struct i915_address_space *vm,
>  {
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, BIT_ULL(GEN8_PTE_SHIFT)));
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(length, BIT_ULL(GEN8_PTE_SHIFT)));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(range_overflows(start, length, vm->total));
>  
>  	start >>= GEN8_PTE_SHIFT;
>  	length >>= GEN8_PTE_SHIFT;
> @@ -1031,15 +1034,17 @@ static void gen8_ppgtt_clear(struct i915_address_space *vm,
>  
>  static int __gen8_ppgtt_alloc(struct i915_address_space * const vm,
>  			      struct i915_page_directory * const pd,
> -			      u64 * const start, u64 end, int lvl)
> +			      u64 * const start, const u64 end, int lvl)
>  {
>  	const struct i915_page_scratch * const scratch = &vm->scratch[lvl];
>  	struct i915_page_table *alloc = NULL;
>  	unsigned int idx, len;
>  	int ret = 0;
>  
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(end > vm->total >> GEN8_PTE_SHIFT);
> +
>  	len = gen8_pd_range(*start, end, lvl--, &idx);
> -	DBG("%s(%p):{lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d}\n",
> +	DBG("%s(%p):{ lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d }\n",
>  	    __func__, vm, lvl + 1, *start, end,
>  	    idx, len, atomic_read(px_used(pd)));
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!len || (idx + len - 1) >> gen8_pd_shift(1));
> @@ -1105,7 +1110,7 @@ static int __gen8_ppgtt_alloc(struct i915_address_space * const vm,
>  		} else {
>  			unsigned int count = gen8_pt_count(*start, end);
>  
> -			DBG("%s(%p):{lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d} inserting pte\n",
> +			DBG("%s(%p):{ lvl:%d, start:%llx, end:%llx, idx:%d, len:%d, used:%d } inserting pte\n",
>  			    __func__, vm, lvl, *start, end,
>  			    gen8_pd_index(*start, 0), count,
>  			    atomic_read(&pt->used));
> @@ -1131,6 +1136,7 @@ static int gen8_ppgtt_alloc(struct i915_address_space *vm,
>  
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(start, BIT_ULL(GEN8_PTE_SHIFT)));
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(length, BIT_ULL(GEN8_PTE_SHIFT)));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(range_overflows(start, length, vm->total));
>  
>  	start >>= GEN8_PTE_SHIFT;
>  	length >>= GEN8_PTE_SHIFT;
> -- 
> 2.23.0.rc1


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list