[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 4/7] drm/i915: utilize subconnector property for DP

Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com
Fri Aug 30 12:13:23 UTC 2019


On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 09:09:14AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 10:27 AM Ville Syrjälä
> <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 04:22:13PM +0300, Oleg Vasilev wrote:
> > > Since DP-specific information is stored in driver's structures, every
> > > driver needs to implement subconnector property by itself.
> > >
> > > v2: updates to match previous commit changes
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Emil Velikov <emil.velikov at collabora.com>
> > > Tested-by: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Oleg Vasilev <oleg.vasilev at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> > > Cc: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 6 ++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > index 6da6a4859f06..9c97ece803eb 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> > > @@ -5434,6 +5434,10 @@ intel_dp_detect(struct drm_connector *connector,
> > >       if (status != connector_status_connected && !intel_dp->is_mst)
> > >               intel_dp_unset_edid(intel_dp);
> > >
> > > +     drm_dp_set_subconnector_property(connector,
> > > +                                      status,
> > > +                                      intel_dp->dpcd,
> > > +                                      intel_dp->downstream_ports);
> > >       return status;
> > >  }
> > >
> > > @@ -6332,6 +6336,8 @@ intel_dp_add_properties(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, struct drm_connector *connect
> > >       struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(connector->dev);
> > >       enum port port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.port;
> > >
> > > +     drm_mode_add_dp_subconnector_property(connector);
> >
> > Maybe skip this for eDP?
> 
> Not sure if you have something similar, but there are AMD platforms
> that contain eDP to LVDS bridges.  Then again, probably not a big deal
> for the laptop panel.

IIRC those don't generally expose the LVDS side as a DFP anyway.
Ie. they just looks like a DP device with a local sink.

-- 
Ville Syrjälä
Intel


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list