[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 4/5] drm/i915/gem: Pin gen6_ppgtt prior to constructing the request
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Dec 6 10:55:26 UTC 2019
All pinning must be done prior to i915_request_create, to avoid
timeline->mutex inversions.
Here we slightly abuse the context_barrier_task stages to utilise the
'skip' decision as an opportunity to acquire the pin on the new ppgtt.
Consider it s/skip/prepare/. At the moment, we only have on user of
context_barrier_task, so it might be worth breaking it down for the
specific task of set-vm and refactor it later if we find a second
purpose.
<4> [402.377487] WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected
<4> [402.377493] 5.4.0-rc8-CI-CI_DRM_7491+ #1 Tainted: G U
<4> [402.377497] ------------------------------------------------------
<4> [402.377502] gem_exec_parall/2506 is trying to acquire lock:
<4> [402.377507] ffff888403cdac70 (&kernel#2){+.+.}, at: i915_request_create+0x16/0x1c0 [i915]
<4> [402.377593]
but task is already holding lock:
<4> [402.377597] ffff88835efad550 (&ppgtt->pin_mutex){+.+.}, at: gen6_ppgtt_pin+0x4d/0x110 [i915]
<4> [402.377660]
which lock already depends on the new lock.
<4> [402.377664]
the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
<4> [402.377668]
-> #1 (&ppgtt->pin_mutex){+.+.}:
<4> [402.377674] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0
<4> [402.377713] gen6_ppgtt_pin+0x4d/0x110 [i915]
<4> [402.377756] emit_ppgtt_update+0x1dc/0x370 [i915]
<4> [402.377801] context_barrier_task+0x176/0x310 [i915]
<4> [402.377844] ctx_setparam+0x400/0xb10 [i915]
<4> [402.377886] i915_gem_context_setparam_ioctl+0xc8/0x160 [i915]
<4> [402.377891] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0
<4> [402.377895] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390
<4> [402.377899] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0
<4> [402.377903] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60
<4> [402.377906] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
<4> [402.377910] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210
<4> [402.377914] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4> [402.377917]
-> #0 (&kernel#2){+.+.}:
<4> [402.377923] __lock_acquire+0x1328/0x15d0
<4> [402.377926] lock_acquire+0xa7/0x1c0
<4> [402.377930] __mutex_lock+0x9a/0x9d0
<4> [402.377977] i915_request_create+0x16/0x1c0 [i915]
<4> [402.378013] intel_engine_flush_barriers+0x4c/0x100 [i915]
<4> [402.378062] i915_ggtt_pin+0x7d/0x130 [i915]
<4> [402.378108] gen6_ppgtt_pin+0x9c/0x110 [i915]
<4> [402.378148] ring_context_pin+0x2e/0xc0 [i915]
<4> [402.378183] __intel_context_do_pin+0x6b/0x190 [i915]
<4> [402.378226] i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x180c/0x26b0 [i915]
<4> [402.378268] i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x11b/0x460 [i915]
<4> [402.378272] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xa7/0xf0
<4> [402.378275] drm_ioctl+0x2e1/0x390
<4> [402.378279] do_vfs_ioctl+0xa0/0x6f0
<4> [402.378282] ksys_ioctl+0x35/0x60
<4> [402.378286] __x64_sys_ioctl+0x11/0x20
<4> [402.378289] do_syscall_64+0x4f/0x210
<4> [402.378292] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe
<4> [402.378295]
other info that might help us debug this:
<4> [402.378299] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
<4> [402.378302] CPU0 CPU1
<4> [402.378305] ---- ----
<4> [402.378307] lock(&ppgtt->pin_mutex);
<4> [402.378310] lock(&kernel#2);
<4> [402.378314] lock(&ppgtt->pin_mutex);
<4> [402.378317] lock(&kernel#2);
<4> [402.378320]
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c | 18 +++++++++++++-----
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
index 9f1dc96b10a6..9d8d75765ee4 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_context.c
@@ -1141,8 +1141,6 @@ static int emit_ppgtt_update(struct i915_request *rq, void *data)
*cs++ = MI_NOOP;
intel_ring_advance(rq, cs);
} else {
- /* ppGTT is not part of the legacy context image */
- gen6_ppgtt_pin(i915_vm_to_ppgtt(vm));
}
return 0;
@@ -1150,10 +1148,20 @@ static int emit_ppgtt_update(struct i915_request *rq, void *data)
static bool skip_ppgtt_update(struct intel_context *ce, void *data)
{
+ if (!test_bit(CONTEXT_ALLOC_BIT, &ce->flags))
+ return true;
+
if (HAS_LOGICAL_RING_CONTEXTS(ce->engine->i915))
- return !ce->state;
- else
- return !atomic_read(&ce->pin_count);
+ return false;
+
+ if (!atomic_read(&ce->pin_count))
+ return true;
+
+ /* ppGTT is not part of the legacy context image */
+ if (gen6_ppgtt_pin(i915_vm_to_ppgtt(ce->vm)))
+ return true;
+
+ return false;
}
static int set_ppgtt(struct drm_i915_file_private *file_priv,
--
2.24.0
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list