[Intel-gfx] [RFC 6/7] drm/i915/dp: Update the pattern as per request
Manasi Navare
manasi.d.navare at intel.com
Wed Dec 11 23:44:16 UTC 2019
Hi Animesh,
I dont see the patch revision with these fixes, have you sent it to the M-L?
Manasi
On Tue, Nov 19, 2019 at 12:17:03AM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
>
>
> On 11/18/2019 12:11 PM, Manasi Navare wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 08:55:48PM +0530, Animesh Manna wrote:
> >>set pattern in DP_COMP_CTL.
> >It would be nice to have some brief description here on
> >context of setting a PHY pattern for PHY compliance and that
> >this will be called during pre enable in atomic commit in case
> >of phy compliance request etc..and that the requested phy pattern
> >is read during test handling etc..
> >something that gives a reader a better idea of the context of
> >this function
> >
> >>Signed-off-by: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna at intel.com>
> >>---
> >> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> 1 file changed, 55 insertions(+)
> >>
> >>diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >>index a2b860cf3b93..df31278a1619 100644
> >>--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >>+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_dp.c
> >>@@ -4955,6 +4955,61 @@ static u8 intel_dp_prepare_phytest(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> return DP_TEST_ACK;
> >> }
> >>+static inline void intel_dp_phy_pattern_update(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >>+{
> >>+ struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> >>+ to_i915(dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp)->base.base.dev);
> >>+ struct intel_digital_port *intel_dig_port = dp_to_dig_port(intel_dp);
> >>+ struct drm_dp_phy_test_params *data =
> >>+ &intel_dp->compliance.test_data.phytest;
> >>+ u32 temp;
> >>+
> >>+ switch (data->phy_pattern) {
> >>+ case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_NONE:
> >>+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disable Phy Test Pattern\n");
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port), 0x0);
> >>+ break;
> >>+ case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_D10_2:
> >>+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set D10.2 Phy Test Pattern\n");
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> >>+ DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_D10_2);
> >>+ break;
> >>+ case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_ERROR_COUNT:
> >>+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set Error Count Phy Test Pattern\n");
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> >>+ DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE |
> >>+ DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_SCRAMBLED_0);
> >>+ break;
> >>+ case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_PRBS7:
> >>+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set PRBS7 Phy Test Pattern\n");
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> >>+ DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_PRBS7);
> >>+ break;
> >>+ case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_80BIT_CUSTOM:
> >>+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set 80Bit Custom Phy Test Pattern\n");
> >>+ temp = ((data->custom80[0] << 24) | (data->custom80[1] << 16) |
> >>+ (data->custom80[2] << 8) | (data->custom80[3]));
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_PAT(intel_dig_port->base.port, 0), temp);
> >>+ temp = ((data->custom80[4] << 24) | (data->custom80[5] << 16) |
> >>+ (data->custom80[6] << 8) | (data->custom80[7]));
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_PAT(intel_dig_port->base.port, 1), temp);
> >>+ temp = ((data->custom80[8] << 8) | data->custom80[9]);
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_PAT(intel_dig_port->base.port, 2), temp);
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> >>+ DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_CUSTOM80);
> >>+ break;
> >>+ case DP_PHY_TEST_PATTERN_CP2520:
> >>+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Set HBR2 compliance Phy Test Pattern\n");
> >>+ temp = ((data->hbr2_reset[1] << 8) | data->hbr2_reset[0]);
> >>+ I915_WRITE(DDI_DP_COMP_CTL(intel_dig_port->base.port),
> >>+ DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_ENABLE | DDI_DP_COMP_CTL_HBR2 |
> >>+ temp);
> >>+ break;
> >>+ default:
> >>+ DRM_ERROR("Invalid Phy Test PAttern\n");
> >Here we would definitely want a WARN since ERROR at this point in commit is not good
> >Other than looks good to me.
>
> Thanks, will add the suggested changes.
>
> Regards,
> Animesh
> >
> >Manasi
> >
> >>+ }
> >>+}
> >>+
> >> static u8 intel_dp_autotest_phy_pattern(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> >> {
> >> u8 test_result = DP_TEST_NAK;
> >>--
> >>2.22.0
> >>
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list