[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/perf: Skip OA testing on systems too old
Lionel Landwerlin
lionel.g.landwerlin at intel.com
Mon Dec 16 10:06:53 UTC 2019
On 16/12/2019 11:56, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-12-16 09:46:56)
>> On 16/12/2019 11:34, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>> Don't flat out fail if the system doesn't support OA, just skip.
>>>
>>> Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/834
>>> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> ---
>>> tests/perf.c | 4 +---
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tests/perf.c b/tests/perf.c
>>> index f5dd6051e..12f552743 100644
>>> --- a/tests/perf.c
>>> +++ b/tests/perf.c
>>> @@ -884,11 +884,9 @@ init_sys_info(void)
>>> const char *test_set_uuid = NULL;
>>> char buf[256];
>>>
>>> - igt_assert_neq(devid, 0);
>>> -
>>> timestamp_frequency = get_cs_timestamp_frequency();
>>> igt_debug("timestamp_frequency = %lu\n", timestamp_frequency);
>>> - igt_assert_neq(timestamp_frequency, 0);
>>> + igt_require(timestamp_frequency);
>>
>> This requires a kernel version more recent (4.16) than when perf support
>> was added (4.13).
>>
>> Is this what you intended?
> You have a fatal assert there. I am just changing it so that it skips
> when not supported as no testing is being performed.
> -Chris
I think there might be a problem in i915 if this returns 0.
When I added this param I went back and figured the value for each platform.
What kind of machine is fi-blb-e6850
<https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/hardware.html#fi-blb-e6850>? The number
looks like a skylake.
-Lionel
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/attachments/20191216/1d544a3c/attachment.htm>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list