[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v6 rebased 7/7] drm/i915/display: Add comment to a function that probably can be removed

[José Roberto de Souza]

This function is only called from port sync and it is identical to
what will be executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync
pipes.
If it is really necessary at least it deserves a better name and a
comment, leaving it to people working on port sync.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
Cc: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza <jose.souza at intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
index 32e1fdfceac7..62ec7e313f50 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.c
@@ -14483,6 +14483,10 @@ static void intel_set_dp_tp_ctl_normal(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 	intel_dp_stop_link_train(intel_dp);
 }
 
+/*
+ * TODO: This is only called from port sync and it is identical to what will be
+ * executed again in intel_update_crtc() over port sync pipes
+ */
 static void intel_post_crtc_enable_updates(struct intel_crtc *crtc,
 					   struct intel_atomic_state *state)
 {
-- 
2.24.1