[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] kms_fence_pin_leak: Move beneath i915/

Chris Wilson chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Mon Feb 18 13:42:48 UTC 2019


Quoting Arkadiusz Hiler (2019-02-18 13:37:07)
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 02:35:56PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > kms_fence_pin_leak tests smooth sharp edges that are i915 specific (and
> > requires using GEM to do so). It doesn't belong in the general paddock
> > of all driver tests, so move it into the i915/ stable.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> > Cc: Arkadiusz Hiler <arkadiusz.hiler at intel.com>
> > Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> > Acked-by: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> > ---
> >  tests/Makefile.sources                | 5 ++++-
> >  tests/{ => i915}/kms_fence_pin_leak.c | 0
> >  tests/meson.build                     | 2 +-
> >  3 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >  rename tests/{ => i915}/kms_fence_pin_leak.c (100%)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tests/Makefile.sources b/tests/Makefile.sources
> > index d2c4f9fe9..9972b2dd1 100644
> > --- a/tests/Makefile.sources
> > +++ b/tests/Makefile.sources
> > @@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ TESTS_progs = \
> >       kms_dp_dsc \
> >       kms_draw_crc \
> >       kms_fbcon_fbt \
> > -     kms_fence_pin_leak \
> >       kms_flip \
> >       kms_flip_event_leak \
> >       kms_flip_tiling \
> > @@ -99,6 +98,10 @@ TESTS_progs = \
> >       vgem_slow \
> >       $(NULL)
> >  
> > +TESTS_progs += \
> > +     i915/kms_fence_pin_leak \
> > +     $(NULL)
> 
> This just moves it around, so we will end up having binary named
> 'kms_fence_pin_leak' but in $SRC/tests/i915 dir instead.
> 
> That still will install as
> $PREFIX/libexec/igt-gpu-tools/kms_fence_pin_leak
> 
> If you want to prefix it:
>  TESTS_progs += i915_kms_fence_pin_leak
>  i915_kms_fence_pin_leak_SOURCES = i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
> 
> Oterwise:
>  TESTS_progs += kms_fence_pin_leak
>  kms_fence_pin_leak_SOURCES = i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
> 
> > diff --git a/tests/kms_fence_pin_leak.c b/tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
> > similarity index 100%
> > rename from tests/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
> > rename to tests/i915/kms_fence_pin_leak.c
> > diff --git a/tests/meson.build b/tests/meson.build
> > index ec980651a..08e55b9c0 100644
> > --- a/tests/meson.build
> > +++ b/tests/meson.build
> > @@ -27,7 +27,6 @@ test_progs = [
> >       'kms_dp_dsc',
> >       'kms_draw_crc',
> >       'kms_fbcon_fbt',
> > -     'kms_fence_pin_leak',
> >       'kms_flip',
> >       'kms_flip_event_leak',
> >       'kms_flip_tiling',
> > @@ -100,6 +99,7 @@ i915_progs = [
> >       'fb_tiling',
> >       'getparams_basic',
> >       'hangman',
> > +     'kms_fence_pin_leak',
> >       'missed_irq',
> >       'module_load',
> >       'query',
> 
> Here, with meson, it will get prefixed with i915_. I'll add a comment on
> top of i915_progs just to be more explicit.
> 
> Do we have any conclusion on prefixing Intel-specific kms tests
> yet?

I'd rather not have tests renamed. That's my personal preference. Either
it is tests/i915/i915_kms_fence_pin_leak (but installed under tests/!)
or it should be installed under tests/i915/.
-Chris


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list