[Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Add Colorspace connector property interface (rev16)

[Shankar, Uma]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Maarten Lankhorst [mailto:maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:27 PM
>To: Shankar, Uma <uma.shankar at intel.com>; intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Add Colorspace connector property
>interface (rev16)
>
>Op 20-02-2019 om 07:01 schreef Shankar, Uma:
>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On
>>> Behalf Of Patchwork
>>> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2019 2:43 AM
>>> To: intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>>> Subject: [Intel-gfx] ✗ Fi.CI.IGT: failure for Add Colorspace
>>> connector property interface (rev16)
>>>
>>> == Series Details ==
>>>
>>> Series: Add Colorspace connector property interface (rev16)
>>> URL   : https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/47132/
>>> State : failure
>>>
>>> == Summary ==
>>>
>>> CI Bug Log - changes from CI_DRM_5632_full -> Patchwork_12260_full
>>> ====================================================
>>>
>>> Summary
>>> -------
>>>
>>>  **FAILURE**
>>>
>>>  Serious unknown changes coming with Patchwork_12260_full absolutely
>>> need to be  verified manually.
>>>
>>>  If you think the reported changes have nothing to do with the
>>> changes  introduced in Patchwork_12260_full, please notify your bug
>>> team to allow them  to document this new failure mode, which will reduce false
>positives in CI.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Possible new issues
>>> -------------------
>>>
>>>  Here are the unknown changes that may have been introduced in
>>> Patchwork_12260_full:
>>>
>>> ### IGT changes ###
>>>
>>> #### Possible regressions ####
>>>
>>>  * igt at pm_rpm@cursor:
>>>    - shard-iclb:         PASS -> INCOMPLETE
>> This is not related to this change, it seems a false positive. Earlier
>> revision with same change had clean IGT pass. This version didn't
>> introduced any major change hence this should be ignored and investigated as to
>why this is coming in the CI runs. Is this already known ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Uma Shankar
>
>
>Noticed pm_rpm at cursor failing, but yeah..
>
>Pushed the series, thanks for your patience. :)

Thanks Maarten for all your support.

Regards,
Uma Shankar