[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 2/5] gem_wsim: Round mmap to page size
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Feb 28 14:41:23 UTC 2019
On 28/02/2019 14:25, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-02-28 14:18:25)
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> mmap(2) mandates size is page aligned.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> ---
>> benchmarks/gem_wsim.c | 7 ++++---
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> index 0a5abc08d8c2..57ceb983cf82 100644
>> --- a/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> +++ b/benchmarks/gem_wsim.c
>> @@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ init_bb(struct w_step *w, unsigned int flags)
>> {
>> const unsigned int arb_period =
>> get_bb_sz(w->preempt_us) / sizeof(uint32_t);
>> + const unsigned int mmap_len = ALIGN(w->bb_sz, 4096);
>> unsigned int i;
>> uint32_t *ptr;
>
> You only need to do it for
>
> ww->bb_sz = ALIGN(get_bb_sz(), 4096);
>
> All batch lengths are start = ww->bb_sz - get_bb_sz() and so remain
> correct. Right?
I think so. I have one more assignment site of w->bb_sz in the upcoming
code so it was 2 : 2 and I flipped a coin. Actually I wanted to make it
explicit what I am fixing - the mmap size. But now you'll say batch size
is also implicitly rounded.. oh well.. I prefer the explicit round up at
mmap time.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list