[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] tests/gem_shrink: Exercise OOM and other routes to shrinking in reasonable time

[Petri Latvala]

On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 11:12:30AM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> 
> On 07/01/2019 11:01, Petri Latvala wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 04, 2019 at 03:37:09PM +0000, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > index 73d127603d28..d76a4b3b1c71 100644
> > > --- a/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > +++ b/tests/intel-ci/blacklist.txt
> > > @@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ igt at gem_ring_sync_copy(@.*)?
> > >   igt at gem_ring_sync_loop(@.*)?
> > >   igt at gem_seqno_wrap(@.*)?
> > >   igt at gem_shrink@(?!reclaim$).*
> > > +igt at gem_shrink@(?!reclaims-and-oom).*
> > >   igt at gem_softpin@.*(hang|S4).*
> > >   igt at gem_spin_batch(@.*)?
> > >   igt at gem_stolen@.*hibernate.*
> > 
> > 
> > In case you didn't notice: The first gem_shrink line removes the
> > reclaims-and-oom* subtests, and the second line (the one you added)
> > then removes the 'reclaim' subtest, resulting in all gem_shrink
> > subtests blacklisted.
> 
> No I haven't thank you. Interestingly the reclaim subtest still did run.

https://intel-gfx-ci.01.org/tree/drm-tip/IGTPW_2185/shards-all.html
it's NOTRUN on all machines on patched IGT.

> Okay, but in essence should this work then:
> 
>   igt at gem_shrink@(?!reclaim).*
> 
> To blacklist everything apart from reclaims and reclaims-and-oom.*
> subtests?

Yeah that looks correct.


-- 
Petri Latvala