[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v5 2/3] drm/i915: Move on the new pm runtime interface

Rafael J. Wysocki rjw at rjwysocki.net
Wed Jan 16 11:59:46 UTC 2019


On Monday, January 7, 2019 3:21:49 PM CET Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 3:04 PM Vincent Guittot
> <vincent.guittot at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tvrtko,
> >
> > On Mon, 31 Dec 2018 at 13:32, Tvrtko Ursulin
> > <tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 21/12/2018 13:26, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 at 12:33, Tvrtko Ursulin
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > >>
> > > >> If it is always monotonic, then worst case we report one wrong sample,
> > > >> which I guess is still not ideal since someone could be querying the PMU
> > > >> with quite low frequency.
> > > >>
> > > >> There are tests which probably can hit this, but to run them
> > > >> automatically your patches would need to be rebased on drm-tip and maybe
> > > >> sent to our trybot. I can do that after the holiday break if you are
> > > >> okay with having the series waiting until then.
> > > >
> > > > yes looks good to me
> > >
> > > Looks good to me as well. And our CI agrees with it. So:
> > >
> > > Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
> >
> > Thanks for the review and the test
> >
> > >
> > > I assume you will take the patch through some power related tree and we
> > > will eventually pull it back to drm-tip.
> >
> > Rafael,
> > How do you want to proceed with this patch and the 2 others of the serie ?
> 
> I'm going to queue up the whole series for 5.1.

And it has been queued up now, thanks!



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list