[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 32/46] drm/i915: Pull VM lists under the VM mutex.

Tvrtko Ursulin tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Wed Jan 16 16:47:43 UTC 2019


On 07/01/2019 11:54, Chris Wilson wrote:
> A starting point to counter the pervasive struct_mutex. For the goal of
> avoiding (or at least blocking under them!) global locks during user
> request submission, a simple but important step is being able to manage
> each clients GTT separately. For which, we want to replace using the
> struct_mutex as the guard for all things GTT/VM and switch instead to a
> specific mutex inside i915_address_space.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c                 | 14 ++++++++------
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c           |  2 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c             | 15 +++++++++++++--
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c        |  4 ++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c          |  2 ++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c                 | 11 +++++++++++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_evict.c |  3 +++
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c   |  3 +++
>   8 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> index 6ed44aeee583..5141a8ba4836 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
> @@ -246,18 +246,19 @@ int
>   i915_gem_get_aperture_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   			    struct drm_file *file)
>   {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);
> -	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &dev_priv->ggtt;
> +	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &to_i915(dev)->ggtt;
>   	struct drm_i915_gem_get_aperture *args = data;
>   	struct i915_vma *vma;
>   	u64 pinned;
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
> +
>   	pinned = ggtt->vm.reserved;
> -	mutex_lock(&dev->struct_mutex);
>   	list_for_each_entry(vma, &ggtt->vm.bound_list, vm_link)
>   		if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma))
>   			pinned += vma->node.size;
> -	mutex_unlock(&dev->struct_mutex);
> +
> +	mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
>   
>   	args->aper_size = ggtt->vm.total;
>   	args->aper_available_size = args->aper_size - pinned;
> @@ -1530,20 +1531,21 @@ i915_gem_pwrite_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev, void *data,
>   
>   static void i915_gem_object_bump_inactive_ggtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
>   {
> -	struct drm_i915_private *i915;
> +	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
>   	struct list_head *list;
>   	struct i915_vma *vma;
>   
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_object_has_pinned_pages(obj));
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);
>   	for_each_ggtt_vma(vma, obj) {
>   		if (!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node))
>   			continue;
>   
>   		list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->bound_list);
>   	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);

This is now struct_mutex -> vm->mutex nesting, which we would preferably 
want to avoid? There only two callers for the function.

It looks we could remove nesting from i915_gem_set_domain_ioctl by just 
moving the call to after mutex unlock.

i915_gem_object_unpin_from_display_plane callers are not as easy so 
maybe at least do the one above?

>   
> -	i915 = to_i915(obj->base.dev);
>   	spin_lock(&i915->mm.obj_lock);
>   	list = obj->bind_count ? &i915->mm.bound_list : &i915->mm.unbound_list;
>   	list_move_tail(&obj->mm.link, list);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> index a76f65fe86be..4a0c6830659d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_evict.c
> @@ -433,6 +433,7 @@ int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm)
>   	}
>   
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&eviction_list);
> +	mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
>   	list_for_each_entry(vma, &vm->bound_list, vm_link) {
>   		if (i915_vma_is_pinned(vma))
>   			continue;
> @@ -440,6 +441,7 @@ int i915_gem_evict_vm(struct i915_address_space *vm)
>   		__i915_vma_pin(vma);
>   		list_add(&vma->evict_link, &eviction_list);
>   	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);

This is another nesting so I suppose you leave all this fun for later?

>   
>   	ret = 0;
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next, &eviction_list, evict_link) {
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index ad4ef8980b97..c3363a9b586b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -1932,7 +1932,10 @@ static struct i915_vma *pd_vma_create(struct gen6_hw_ppgtt *ppgtt, int size)
>   	vma->ggtt_view.type = I915_GGTT_VIEW_ROTATED; /* prevent fencing */
>   
>   	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vma->obj_link);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   	list_add(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->unbound_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   
>   	return vma;
>   }
> @@ -3504,9 +3507,10 @@ void i915_gem_restore_gtt_mappings(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   
>   	i915_check_and_clear_faults(dev_priv);
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
> +
>   	/* First fill our portion of the GTT with scratch pages */
>   	ggtt->vm.clear_range(&ggtt->vm, 0, ggtt->vm.total);
> -
>   	ggtt->vm.closed = true; /* skip rewriting PTE on VMA unbind */
>   
>   	/* clflush objects bound into the GGTT and rebind them. */
> @@ -3516,19 +3520,26 @@ void i915_gem_restore_gtt_mappings(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>   		if (!(vma->flags & I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND))
>   			continue;
>   
> +		mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
> +
>   		if (!i915_vma_unbind(vma))
> -			continue;
> +			goto lock;
>   
>   		WARN_ON(i915_vma_bind(vma,
>   				      obj ? obj->cache_level : 0,
>   				      PIN_UPDATE));
>   		if (obj)
>   			WARN_ON(i915_gem_object_set_to_gtt_domain(obj, false));
> +
> +lock:
> +		mutex_lock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
>   	}
>   
>   	ggtt->vm.closed = false;
>   	i915_ggtt_invalidate(dev_priv);
>   
> +	mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
> +
>   	if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 8) {
>   		struct intel_ppat *ppat = &dev_priv->ppat;
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> index 1531534eea02..786121609016 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_shrinker.c
> @@ -489,6 +489,7 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_vmap(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr
>   					       I915_SHRINK_VMAPS);
>   
>   	/* We also want to clear any cached iomaps as they wrap vmap */
> +	mutex_lock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);
>   	list_for_each_entry_safe(vma, next,
>   				 &i915->ggtt.vm.bound_list, vm_link) {
>   		unsigned long count = vma->node.size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> @@ -496,9 +497,12 @@ i915_gem_shrinker_vmap(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr
>   		if (!vma->iomap || i915_vma_is_active(vma))
>   			continue;
>   
> +		mutex_unlock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);
>   		if (i915_vma_unbind(vma) == 0)
>   			freed_pages += count;
> +		mutex_lock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);
>   	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&i915->ggtt.vm.mutex);
>   
>   out:
>   	shrinker_unlock(i915, unlock);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> index 75b97d71f072..21de3a5e9910 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_stolen.c
> @@ -703,7 +703,9 @@ i915_gem_object_create_stolen_for_preallocated(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv
>   	vma->flags |= I915_VMA_GLOBAL_BIND;
>   	__i915_vma_set_map_and_fenceable(vma);
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
>   	list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &ggtt->vm.bound_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
>   
>   	spin_lock(&dev_priv->mm.obj_lock);
>   	list_move_tail(&obj->mm.link, &dev_priv->mm.bound_list);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> index 7de28baffb8f..dcbd0d345c72 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_vma.c
> @@ -213,7 +213,10 @@ vma_create(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj,
>   	}
>   	rb_link_node(&vma->obj_node, rb, p);
>   	rb_insert_color(&vma->obj_node, &obj->vma_tree);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vm->mutex);
>   	list_add(&vma->vm_link, &vm->unbound_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vm->mutex);
>   
>   	return vma;
>   
> @@ -656,7 +659,9 @@ i915_vma_insert(struct i915_vma *vma, u64 size, u64 alignment, u64 flags)
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!drm_mm_node_allocated(&vma->node));
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(!i915_gem_valid_gtt_space(vma, cache_level));
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   	list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->bound_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   
>   	if (vma->obj) {
>   		struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj = vma->obj;
> @@ -689,8 +694,10 @@ i915_vma_remove(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   
>   	vma->ops->clear_pages(vma);
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   	drm_mm_remove_node(&vma->node);

This is by design also protected by the vm->mutex? But insertion is not 
AFAICT.

>   	list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->unbound_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   
>   	/*
>   	 * Since the unbound list is global, only move to that list if
> @@ -802,7 +809,11 @@ static void __i915_vma_destroy(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   	GEM_BUG_ON(i915_gem_active_isset(&vma->last_fence));
>   
>   	list_del(&vma->obj_link);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   	list_del(&vma->vm_link);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
> +
>   	if (vma->obj)
>   		rb_erase(&vma->obj_node, &vma->obj->vma_tree);
>   
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_evict.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_evict.c
> index 9d0fe8aac219..eaefba7470f7 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_evict.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_evict.c
> @@ -67,10 +67,13 @@ static int populate_ggtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   
>   static void unpin_ggtt(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>   {
> +	struct i915_ggtt *ggtt = &i915->ggtt;
>   	struct i915_vma *vma;
>   
> +	mutex_lock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
>   	list_for_each_entry(vma, &i915->ggtt.vm.bound_list, vm_link)
>   		i915_vma_unpin(vma);
> +	mutex_unlock(&ggtt->vm.mutex);
>   }
>   
>   static void cleanup_objects(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> index 852b06cb50a0..35eb40e5de91 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c
> @@ -1237,7 +1237,10 @@ static void track_vma_bind(struct i915_vma *vma)
>   	__i915_gem_object_pin_pages(obj);
>   
>   	vma->pages = obj->mm.pages;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   	list_move_tail(&vma->vm_link, &vma->vm->bound_list);
> +	mutex_unlock(&vma->vm->mutex);
>   }
>   
>   static int exercise_mock(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> 

Regards,

Tvrtko


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list