[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 31/33] drm/i915/execlists: Refactor out can_merge_rq()
Chris Wilson
chris at chris-wilson.co.uk
Fri Jan 25 02:30:03 UTC 2019
In the next patch, we add another user that wants to check whether
requests can be merge into a single HW execution, and in the future we
want to add more conditions under which requests from the same context
cannot be merge. In preparation, extract out can_merge_rq().
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index cbf20273e9f8..151e4ae48ea0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -284,12 +284,11 @@ static inline bool need_preempt(const struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
}
__maybe_unused static inline bool
-assert_priority_queue(const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists,
- const struct i915_request *prev,
+assert_priority_queue(const struct i915_request *prev,
const struct i915_request *next)
{
- if (!prev)
- return true;
+ const struct intel_engine_execlists *execlists =
+ &prev->engine->execlists;
/*
* Without preemption, the prev may refer to the still active element
@@ -594,6 +593,17 @@ static bool can_merge_ctx(const struct intel_context *prev,
return true;
}
+static bool can_merge_rq(const struct i915_request *prev,
+ const struct i915_request *next)
+{
+ GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_priority_queue(prev, next));
+
+ if (!can_merge_ctx(prev->hw_context, next->hw_context))
+ return false;
+
+ return true;
+}
+
static void port_assign(struct execlist_port *port, struct i915_request *rq)
{
GEM_BUG_ON(rq == port_request(port));
@@ -744,8 +754,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
int i;
priolist_for_each_request_consume(rq, rn, p, i) {
- GEM_BUG_ON(!assert_priority_queue(execlists, last, rq));
-
/*
* Can we combine this request with the current port?
* It has to be the same context/ringbuffer and not
@@ -757,8 +765,10 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
* second request, and so we never need to tell the
* hardware about the first.
*/
- if (last &&
- !can_merge_ctx(rq->hw_context, last->hw_context)) {
+ if (last && !can_merge_rq(last, rq)) {
+ if (last->hw_context == rq->hw_context)
+ goto done;
+
/*
* If we are on the second port and cannot
* combine this request with the last, then we
@@ -778,7 +788,6 @@ static void execlists_dequeue(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
ctx_single_port_submission(rq->hw_context))
goto done;
- GEM_BUG_ON(last->hw_context == rq->hw_context);
if (submit)
port_assign(port, last);
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list