[Intel-gfx] [PATCH i-g-t 8/8] intel-ci: Drop gem_exec_nop from BAT

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> This pair, gem_exec_nop/{series,parallel}, are very light stress tests
> of which we already perform the same sequence inside
> i915_selftests/live_requests. We keep basic uABI coverage (i.e. plain
> old gem_execbuf) via the likes of gem_exec_basic and gem_exec_reloc so
> all gem_exec_nop adds are nefarious HW details, much less likely to spot
> if a test is of sound quality for further testing (and again, we have
> alternate coverage of the same HW stress).
>
> Between the pair of subtests, gem_exec_nop takes about 20s of BAT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at intel.com>
> Cc: Petri Latvala <petri.latvala at intel.com>
> Cc: Tomi Sarvela <tomi.p.sarvela at intel.com>

I was going to say that I have already stamped this.
But re-checking the previous submission, I haven't.
Perhaps I forgot to press send.

Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala at linux.intel.com>

> ---
>  tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist | 2 --
>  1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> index da3c4c8ed..a95d2e95c 100644
> --- a/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> +++ b/tests/intel-ci/fast-feedback.testlist
> @@ -43,8 +43,6 @@ igt at gem_exec_fence@basic-wait-default
>  igt at gem_exec_fence@basic-await-default
>  igt at gem_exec_fence@nb-await-default
>  igt at gem_exec_gttfill@basic
> -igt at gem_exec_nop@basic-parallel
> -igt at gem_exec_nop@basic-series
>  igt at gem_exec_parallel@basic
>  igt at gem_exec_parse@basic-allowed
>  igt at gem_exec_parse@basic-rejected
> -- 
> 2.20.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx