[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 10/25] drm/i915/tgl: Add power well to support 4th pipe
Rodrigo Vivi
rodrigo.vivi at intel.com
Wed Jul 10 11:04:29 UTC 2019
On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 09:20:42AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2019 at 04:57:32AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 08, 2019 at 04:16:14PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> > > From: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > >
> > > Add power well 5 to support 4th pipe and transcoder on TGL.
> > >
> > > Cc: James Ausmus <james.ausmus at intel.com>
> > > Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Mika Kahola <mika.kahola at intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++---
> > > .../drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h | 3 ++
> > > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 3 +-
> > > 3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > index c3f42169831f..455f9aab188d 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.c
> > > @@ -37,18 +37,24 @@ intel_display_power_domain_str(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
> > > return "PIPE_B";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C:
> > > return "PIPE_C";
> > > + case POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_D:
> > > + return "PIPE_D";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A_PANEL_FITTER:
> > > return "PIPE_A_PANEL_FITTER";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_B_PANEL_FITTER:
> > > return "PIPE_B_PANEL_FITTER";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C_PANEL_FITTER:
> > > return "PIPE_C_PANEL_FITTER";
> > > + case POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_D_PANEL_FITTER:
> > > + return "PIPE_D_PANEL_FITTER";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A:
> > > return "TRANSCODER_A";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_B:
> > > return "TRANSCODER_B";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_C:
> > > return "TRANSCODER_C";
> > > + case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_D:
> > > + return "TRANSCODER_D";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP:
> > > return "TRANSCODER_EDP";
> > > case POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC:
> > > @@ -2451,7 +2457,6 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > * - DDI_A
> > > * - FBC
> > > */
> > > -/* TODO: TGL_PW_5_POWER_DOMAINS: PIPE_D */
> > > #define ICL_PW_4_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C_PANEL_FITTER) | \
> > > @@ -2539,7 +2544,13 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > #define ICL_AUX_TBT4_IO_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_AUX_TBT4))
> > >
> > > +#define TGL_PW_5_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> > > + BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_D) | \
> > > + BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_D_PANEL_FITTER) | \
> > > + BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > > +
> > > #define TGL_PW_4_POWER_DOMAINS ( \
> > > + TGL_PW_5_POWER_DOMAINS | \
> >
> > why?
>
> not sure I understand this one. Are you saying we shouldn't have a new
> power well for pipe d? How would we handle the different ctl?
We should have a new one. The above block who adds PW5 domains is okay.
What I didn't understand is why to add pipe D also on PW4
>
> >
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C_PANEL_FITTER) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_INIT))
> > > @@ -2549,7 +2560,7 @@ void intel_display_power_put(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_B) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_B) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_C) | \
> > > - /* TODO: TRANSCODER_D */ \
> > > + BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_D) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_B_PANEL_FITTER) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_TC1_LANES) | \
> > > BIT_ULL(POWER_DOMAIN_PORT_DDI_TC1_IO) | \
> > > @@ -3882,7 +3893,7 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc tgl_power_wells[] = {
> > > },
> > > {
> > > .name = "power well 4",
> > > - .domains = ICL_PW_4_POWER_DOMAINS,
> > > + .domains = TGL_PW_4_POWER_DOMAINS,
> >
> > why?
>
> this is a leftover from v1 and should be squashed on previous patch, my
> bad. In v1 we were reusing the ICL definitions. I changed in this
> revision and forgot to squash this change there. I will send a new
> version
>
> thanks
>
> Lucas De Marchi
>
> >
> > > .ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
> > > .id = DISP_PW_ID_NONE,
> > > {
> > > @@ -3892,7 +3903,18 @@ static const struct i915_power_well_desc tgl_power_wells[] = {
> > > .hsw.irq_pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_C),
> > > }
> > > },
> > > - /* TODO: power well 5 for pipe D */
> > > + {
> > > + .name = "power well 5",
> > > + .domains = TGL_PW_5_POWER_DOMAINS,
> > > + .ops = &hsw_power_well_ops,
> > > + .id = DISP_PW_ID_NONE,
> > > + {
> > > + .hsw.regs = &hsw_power_well_regs,
> > > + .hsw.idx = TGL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_5,
> > > + .hsw.has_fuses = true,
> > > + .hsw.irq_pipe_mask = BIT(PIPE_D),
> > > + },
> > > + },
> > > };
> > >
> > > static int
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> > > index 86afd70c1fb2..ebb397e330ea 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display_power.h
> > > @@ -18,12 +18,15 @@ enum intel_display_power_domain {
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_B,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C,
> > > + POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_D,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_A_PANEL_FITTER,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_B_PANEL_FITTER,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_C_PANEL_FITTER,
> > > + POWER_DOMAIN_PIPE_D_PANEL_FITTER,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_A,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_B,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_C,
> > > + POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_D,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_EDP_VDSC,
> > > POWER_DOMAIN_TRANSCODER_DSI_A,
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > index f59cb5c45c34..5ca74eca05a4 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
> > > @@ -9147,7 +9147,8 @@ enum {
> > > #define GLK_PW_CTL_IDX_DDI_A 1
> > > #define SKL_PW_CTL_IDX_MISC_IO 0
> > >
> > > -/* ICL - power wells */
> > > +/* ICL/TGL - power wells */
> > > +#define TGL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_5 4
> > > #define ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_4 3
> > > #define ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_3 2
> > > #define ICL_PW_CTL_IDX_PW_2 1
> > > --
> > > 2.21.0
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list