[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 04/11] drm/i915/gtt: Markup i915_ppgtt depth

[Mika Kuoppala]

Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:

> Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-07-10 15:25:38)
>> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>> 
>> > Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2019-07-10 09:17:27)
>> >> Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> writes:
>> >> 
>> >> > This will be useful to consolidate recursive code.
>> >> >
>> >> > Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> >> > ---
>> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 3 +++
>> >> >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.h | 1 +
>> >> >  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
>> >> >
>> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> >> > index da4db76ce054..2fc60e8acd9a 100644
>> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> >> > @@ -1537,6 +1537,8 @@ static void ppgtt_init(struct i915_ppgtt *ppgtt, struct intel_gt *gt)
>> >> >       ppgtt->vm.vma_ops.unbind_vma  = ppgtt_unbind_vma;
>> >> >       ppgtt->vm.vma_ops.set_pages   = ppgtt_set_pages;
>> >> >       ppgtt->vm.vma_ops.clear_pages = clear_pages;
>> >> > +
>> >> > +     ppgtt->vm.top = i915_vm_is_4lvl(&ppgtt->vm) ? 3 : 2;
>> >> 
>> >> Perhaps it becomes evident later in the series why top and
>> >> not level, so these would be 4 and 3 here.
>> >
>> > Because we use top and not level :)
>> 
>> You make me substract one with my biological processor.
>> It is hard.
>> 
>> Please do remake the i915_vm_is_4lvl() and include.
>
> I'm tempted to put the gtt_depth in the device info.
>
> How do you want i915_vm_is_4lvl() remade? The special case going
> forward is really is_3lvl?

No strong feelings here. How about i915_vm_get_lvl(vm)
{ return top + 1; } ?

But anything which looks sleek on callsites is fine.

-Mika