[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v3 1/1] drm/i915: Add modular FIA

Lucas De Marchi lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Jul 11 23:49:07 UTC 2019


On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 04:15:42PM -0700, Summers, Stuart wrote:
>On Thu, 2019-07-11 at 13:58 -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
>> From: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
>>
>> Some platforms may have Modular FIA. If Modular FIA is used in the
>> SOC,
>> then Display Driver will access the additional instances of
>> FIA based on pre-assigned offset in GTTMADDR space.
>>
>> Each Modular FIA instance has its own IOSF Sideband Port ID
>> and it houses only 2 Type-C Port. In SOC that has more than
>> two Type-C Ports, there are multiple instances of Modular FIA.
>> Gunit will need to use different destination ID when it access
>> different pair of Type-C Port.
>>
>> The DFLEXDPSP register has Modular FIA bit starting on Tiger
>> Lake.  If
>> Modular FIA is used in the SOC, this register bit exists in all the
>> instances of Modular FIA. IOM FW is required to program only the MF
>> bit
>> in first FIA instance that houses the Type-C Port 0 and Port 1, for
>> Display Driver to read from.
>>
>> v2 (Lucas):
>>   - Move all accesses to FIA to be contained in intel_tc.c, along
>> with
>>     display_fia that is now called tc_phy_fia
>>   - Save the fia instance number on intel_digital_port, so we don't
>> have
>>     to query if modular FIA is used on every access
>> v3 (Lucas): Make function static
>> v4 (Lucas): Move enum phy_fia to the header and use it in
>>    intel_digital_port (suggested by Ville)
>>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Anusha Srivatsa <anusha.srivatsa at intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com>
>> Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h |  6 +++
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c      | 43 ++++++++++++++++
>> ----
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h              | 13 ++++--
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h     |  1 +
>>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h             |  1 +
>>  5 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> index 8a4a57ef82a2..8b048976f7b4 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_display.h
>> @@ -243,6 +243,12 @@ enum phy {
>>
>>  #define phy_name(a) ((a) + 'A')
>>
>> +enum phy_fia {
>> +	FIA1,
>> +	FIA2,
>> +	FIA3,
>> +};
>> +
>>  #define for_each_pipe(__dev_priv, __p) \
>>  	for ((__p) = 0; (__p) < INTEL_INFO(__dev_priv)->num_pipes;
>> (__p)++)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
>> index f44ee4bfe7c8..9400da4f7916 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_tc.c
>> @@ -22,6 +22,24 @@ static const char *tc_port_mode_name(enum
>> tc_port_mode mode)
>>  	return names[mode];
>>  }
>>
>> +static bool has_modular_fia(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
>> +{
>> +	if (!INTEL_INFO(i915)->display.has_modular_fia)
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	return intel_uncore_read(&i915->uncore,
>> +				 PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP(FIA1)) &
>> MODULAR_FIA_MASK;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static enum phy_fia tc_port_to_fia(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> +				   enum tc_port tc_port)
>> +{
>> +	if (!has_modular_fia(i915))
>> +		return FIA1;
>> +
>> +	return tc_port / 2;
>
>I realize this is described in the commit message, but would be nice to
>have a brief comment describing why we need this conversion.
>
>> +}
>> +
>>  u32 intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(struct intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>>  {
>>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = to_i915(dig_port-
>> >base.base.dev);
>> @@ -29,7 +47,8 @@ u32 intel_tc_port_get_lane_mask(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>>  	struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
>>  	u32 lane_mask;
>>
>> -	lane_mask = intel_uncore_read(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP);
>> +	lane_mask = intel_uncore_read(uncore,
>> +				      PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP(dig_port-
>> >tc_phy_fia));
>>
>>  	WARN_ON(lane_mask == 0xffffffff);
>>
>> @@ -78,7 +97,8 @@ void intel_tc_port_set_fia_lane_count(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
>>
>>  	WARN_ON(lane_reversal && dig_port->tc_mode != TC_PORT_LEGACY);
>>
>> -	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1);
>> +	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore,
>> +				PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1(dig_port-
>> >tc_phy_fia));
>>  	val &= ~DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_MASK(tc_port);
>>
>>  	switch (required_lanes) {
>> @@ -97,7 +117,8 @@ void intel_tc_port_set_fia_lane_count(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
>>  		MISSING_CASE(required_lanes);
>>  	}
>>
>> -	intel_uncore_write(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1, val);
>> +	intel_uncore_write(uncore,
>> +			   PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1(dig_port->tc_phy_fia),
>> val);
>>  }
>>
>>  static void tc_port_fixup_legacy_flag(struct intel_digital_port
>> *dig_port,
>> @@ -129,7 +150,8 @@ static u32 tc_port_live_status_mask(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>>  	u32 mask = 0;
>>  	u32 val;
>>
>> -	val = intel_uncore_rea
>> d(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP);
>> +	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore,
>> +				PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP(dig_port-
>> >tc_phy_fia));
>>
>>  	if (val == 0xffffffff) {
>>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: PHY in TCCOLD, nothing
>> connected\n",
>> @@ -159,7 +181,8 @@ static bool icl_tc_phy_status_complete(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>>  	struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
>>  	u32 val;
>>
>> -	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPPMS);
>> +	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore,
>> +				PORT_TX_DFLEXDPPMS(dig_port-
>> >tc_phy_fia));
>>  	if (val == 0xffffffff) {
>>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: PHY in TCCOLD, assuming not
>> complete\n",
>>  			      dig_port->tc_port_name);
>> @@ -177,7 +200,8 @@ static bool icl_tc_phy_set_safe_mode(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
>>  	struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
>>  	u32 val;
>>
>> -	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS);
>> +	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore,
>> +				PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS(dig_port-
>> >tc_phy_fia));
>>  	if (val == 0xffffffff) {
>>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: PHY in TCCOLD, can't set safe-
>> mode to %s\n",
>>  			      dig_port->tc_port_name,
>> @@ -190,7 +214,8 @@ static bool icl_tc_phy_set_safe_mode(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port,
>>  	if (!enable)
>>  		val |= DP_PHY_MODE_STATUS_NOT_SAFE(tc_port);
>>
>> -	intel_uncore_write(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS, val);
>> +	intel_uncore_write(uncore,
>> +			   PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS(dig_port->tc_phy_fia),
>> val);
>>
>>  	if (enable && wait_for(!icl_tc_phy_status_complete(dig_port),
>> 10))
>>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: PHY complete clear timed
>> out\n",
>> @@ -206,7 +231,8 @@ static bool icl_tc_phy_is_in_safe_mode(struct
>> intel_digital_port *dig_port)
>>  	struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
>>  	u32 val;
>>
>> -	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS);
>> +	val = intel_uncore_read(uncore,
>> +				PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS(dig_port-
>> >tc_phy_fia));
>>  	if (val == 0xffffffff) {
>>  		DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Port %s: PHY in TCCOLD, assume safe
>> mode\n",
>>  			      dig_port->tc_port_name);
>> @@ -503,4 +529,5 @@ void intel_tc_port_init(struct intel_digital_port
>> *dig_port, bool is_legacy)
>>  	mutex_init(&dig_port->tc_lock);
>>  	dig_port->tc_legacy_port = is_legacy;
>>  	dig_port->tc_link_refcount = 0;
>> +	dig_port->tc_phy_fia = tc_port_to_fia(i915, tc_port);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> index 95b9ca1fda2e..d0510022013c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h
>> @@ -2203,9 +2203,13 @@ enum i915_power_well_id {
>>  #define   DW6_OLDO_DYN_PWR_DOWN_EN	(1 << 28)
>>
>>  #define FIA1_BASE			0x163000
>> +#define FIA2_BASE			0x16E000
>> +#define FIA3_BASE			0x16F000
>> +#define _FIA(fia)			_PICK((fia), FIA1_BASE,
>> FIA2_BASE, FIA3_BASE)
>> +#define _MMIO_FIA(fia, off)		_MMIO(_FIA(fia) + (off))
>>
>>  /* ICL PHY DFLEX registers */
>> -#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1		_MMIO(FIA1_BASE + 0x008C0)
>> +#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPMLE1(fia)	_MMIO_FIA((fia),  0x008C0)
>>  #define   DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_MASK(tc_port)	(0xf << (4 *
>> (tc_port)))
>>  #define   DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML0(tc_port)	(1 << (4 * (tc_port)))
>>  #define   DFLEXDPMLE1_DPMLETC_ML1_0(tc_port)	(3 << (4 * (tc_port)))
>> @@ -11484,17 +11488,18 @@ enum skl_power_gate {
>>  						_ICL_DSC1_RC_BUF_THRESH
>> _1_UDW_PB, \
>>  						_ICL_DSC1_RC_BUF_THRESH
>> _1_UDW_PC)
>>
>> -#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP			_MMIO(FIA1_BASE +
>> 0x008A0)
>> +#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPSP(fia)			_MMIO_FIA((fia)
>> , 0x008A0)
>> +#define   MODULAR_FIA_MASK			(1 << 4)
>>  #define   TC_LIVE_STATE_TBT(tc_port)		(1 << ((tc_port) * 8 +
>> 6))
>>  #define   TC_LIVE_STATE_TC(tc_port)		(1 << ((tc_port) * 8 +
>> 5))
>>  #define   DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT_SHIFT(tc_port)	((tc_port) * 8)
>>  #define   DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT_MASK(tc_port)	(0xf << ((tc_port) *
>> 8))
>>  #define   DP_LANE_ASSIGNMENT(tc_port, x)	((x) << ((tc_port) *
>> 8))
>>
>> -#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPPMS				_MMIO(FIA1_BASE
>> + 0x00890)
>> +#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPPMS(fia)			_MMIO_FIA((fia)
>> , 0x00890)
>>  #define   DP_PHY_MODE_STATUS_COMPLETED(tc_port)		(1 <<
>> (tc_port))
>>
>> -#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS			_MMIO(FIA1_BASE +
>> 0x00894)
>> +#define PORT_TX_DFLEXDPCSSS(fia)		_MMIO_FIA((fia),
>> 0x00894)
>>  #define   DP_PHY_MODE_STATUS_NOT_SAFE(tc_port)		(1 <<
>> (tc_port))
>>
>>  #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> index ddafc819bf30..e9dc86ed517b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
>> @@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ enum intel_ppgtt_type {
>>  	func(has_gmch); \
>>  	func(has_hotplug); \
>>  	func(has_ipc); \
>> +	func(has_modular_fia); \
>
>If we have a register to tell us whether the platform supports this,
>why do we need this feature flag?

because the platform may not have the register bit that tells if the we
have modular FIA, as is the case with Ice Lake. The bit is reserved
there. This is actually "may_have_modular_fia" rather than
"has_modular_fia", but the name is pretty bad to make it that way.

Lucas De Marchi

>
>Thanks,
>Stuart
>
>>  	func(has_overlay); \
>>  	func(has_psr); \
>>  	func(overlay_needs_physical); \
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> index 770f9f6aad84..e8ecbd55476e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h
>> @@ -1245,6 +1245,7 @@ struct intel_digital_port {
>>  	bool tc_legacy_port:1;
>>  	char tc_port_name[8];
>>  	enum tc_port_mode tc_mode;
>> +	enum phy_fia tc_phy_fia;
>>
>>  	void (*write_infoframe)(struct intel_encoder *encoder,
>>  				const struct intel_crtc_state
>> *crtc_state,




More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list