[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/vgem: Reclassify buffer creation debug message

[Daniel Vetter]

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 2:01 PM Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
>
> A buffer is created in response to the user ioctl, it should therefore
> be a plain DRM_DEBUG() message to reflect it being a user invoked
> response and not a driver construct.
>
> This is just to make the commonplace drm.debug=[26e] quieter when
> running with vgem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_drv.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_drv.c
> index 386efc3b5843..76d95b5e289c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_drv.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_drv.c
> @@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static int vgem_gem_dumb_create(struct drm_file *file, struct drm_device *dev,
>         args->size = gem_object->size;
>         args->pitch = pitch;
>
> -       DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Created object of size %lld\n", size);
> +       DRM_DEBUG("Created object of size %lld\n", size);

Hm, I honestly dunno what DRM_DEBUG is for, except generating noise.
Maybe also ditch this outright. Either approach gets my

Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>

>
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.22.0
>


-- 
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch