[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 2/9] drm/i915/uc: Unify uC platform check

Michal Wajdeczko michal.wajdeczko at intel.com
Tue Jul 23 11:19:35 UTC 2019


On Tue, 23 Jul 2019 01:20:41 +0200, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio  
<daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com> wrote:

> We have several HAS_* checks for GuC and HuC but we mostly use HAS_GUC
> and HAS_HUC, with only 1 exception. Since our HW always has either
> both uC or neither of them, just replace all the checks with a unified
> HAS_UC.

our hardware has also other micro-controller (DMC aka CSR) so maybe to
avoid ambiguity we shall call it HAS_GT_UC ?

on other hand our documentation mostly uses term GUC (see GEN6_GDRST)
so maybe we should not to try to diverse from that and keep using HAS_GUC?

if you insist then we can drop HAS_HUC but imho this macro was useful to
keep code clear (GuC related code was using HAS_GUC, HuC related HAS_HUC)

#define HAS_GT_UC(i915)	(INTEL_INFO(i915)->has_gt_uc)
// GuC and HuC are GT uC
#define HAS_GUC(i915)	HAS_GT_UC(i915)
#define HAS_HUC(i915)	HAS_GT_UC(i915)

and we can avoid referring to hw details where not really needed
(yes, I know, every developer should already know such hw details)

>
> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c     |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c       |  6 +++---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h           | 15 ++-------------
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c     |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c           |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c           |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h  |  2 +-
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c           |  4 ++--
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c        |  4 ++--
>  13 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> index 55e2ddcbd215..7fd135a5a41f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ int intel_reset_guc(struct intel_gt *gt)
>  		INTEL_GEN(gt->i915) >= 11 ? GEN11_GRDOM_GUC : GEN9_GRDOM_GUC;
>  	int ret;
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(gt->i915));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_UC(gt->i915));

there is "guc" in function name
there is "GUC" in bitfield name

but you are checking UC ;)

> 	intel_uncore_forcewake_get(gt->uncore, FORCEWAKE_ALL);
>  	ret = gen6_hw_domain_reset(gt, guc_domain);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.c
> index 3dfa40fdbe99..ddd3b2162528 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_fw.c
> @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ static void guc_fw_select(struct intel_uc_fw *guc_fw)
> 	GEM_BUG_ON(guc_fw->type != INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_GUC);
> -	if (!HAS_GUC(i915)) {
> +	if (!HAS_UC(i915)) {
>  		guc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>  		return;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c
> index 543854c42d9d..15891cf4bb2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_huc_fw.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ static void huc_fw_select(struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw)
> 	GEM_BUG_ON(huc_fw->type != INTEL_UC_FW_TYPE_HUC);
> -	if (!HAS_HUC(dev_priv)) {
> +	if (!HAS_UC(dev_priv)) {
>  		huc_fw->fetch_status = INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_NOT_SUPPORTED;
>  		return;
>  	}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> index 4480a3dc2449..0d50b73f6cfe 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
> @@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ static int __get_platform_enable_guc(struct intel_uc  
> *uc)
>  	struct intel_uc_fw *huc_fw = &uc->huc.fw;
>  	int enable_guc = 0;
> -	if (!HAS_GUC(uc_to_gt(uc)->i915))
> +	if (!HAS_UC(uc_to_gt(uc)->i915))
>  		return 0;
> 	/* We don't want to enable GuC/HuC on pre-Gen11 by default */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
> index 93f7c930ab18..d1aa180050c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/selftest_guc.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static int igt_guc_clients(void *args)
>  	struct intel_guc *guc;
>  	int err = 0;
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(dev_priv));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_UC(dev_priv));
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>  	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> @@ -226,7 +226,7 @@ static int igt_guc_doorbells(void *arg)
>  	int i, err = 0;
>  	u16 db_id;
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(dev_priv));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_UC(dev_priv));
>  	mutex_lock(&dev_priv->drm.struct_mutex);
>  	wakeref = intel_runtime_pm_get(&dev_priv->runtime_pm);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> index 6b84d04a6a28..4249107f9d0d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c
> @@ -1865,7 +1865,7 @@ static int i915_huc_load_status_info(struct  
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  	struct drm_printer p;
> -	if (!HAS_HUC(dev_priv))
> +	if (!HAS_UC(dev_priv))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> 	p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
> @@ -1883,7 +1883,7 @@ static int i915_guc_load_status_info(struct  
> seq_file *m, void *data)
>  	intel_wakeref_t wakeref;
>  	struct drm_printer p;
> -	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +	if (!HAS_UC(dev_priv))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> 	p = drm_seq_file_printer(m);
> @@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@ static int i915_guc_log_dump(struct seq_file *m,  
> void *data)
>  	u32 *log;
>  	int i = 0;
> -	if (!HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +	if (!HAS_UC(dev_priv))
>  		return -ENODEV;
> 	if (dump_load_err)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> index 0e44cc4b2ca1..06ddc5df12fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h
> @@ -2271,20 +2271,9 @@ IS_SUBPLATFORM(const struct drm_i915_private  
> *i915,
> #define HAS_IPC(dev_priv)		 (INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->display.has_ipc)
> -/*
> - * For now, anything with a GuC requires uCode loading, and then  
> supports
> - * command submission once loaded. But these are logically independent
> - * properties, so we have separate macros to test them.
> - */
> -#define HAS_GUC(dev_priv)	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_guc)
> -#define HAS_GUC_UCODE(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> -#define HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))

yep, _UCODE and _SCHED should be nuked

> -
> -/* For now, anything with a GuC has also HuC */
> -#define HAS_HUC(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> -#define HAS_HUC_UCODE(dev_priv)	(HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +#define HAS_UC(dev_priv)	(INTEL_INFO(dev_priv)->has_uc)

time to use i915 instead of dev_priv

> -/* Having a GuC is not the same as using a GuC */
> +/* Having a uC is not the same as using a uC */
>  #define USES_GUC(dev_priv)		intel_uc_is_using_guc(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
>  #define  
> USES_GUC_SUBMISSION(dev_priv)	intel_uc_is_using_guc_submission(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
>  #define USES_HUC(dev_priv)		intel_uc_is_using_huc(&(dev_priv)->gt.uc)
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> index c5b89bf4d616..1db4d7302734 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static void err_print_uc(struct  
> drm_i915_error_state_buf *m,
>  	const struct i915_gpu_state *error =
>  		container_of(error_uc, typeof(*error), uc);
> -	if (!error->device_info.has_guc)
> +	if (!error->device_info.has_uc)
>  		return;
> 	intel_uc_fw_dump(&error_uc->guc_fw, &p);
> @@ -1557,7 +1557,7 @@ static void capture_uc_state(struct i915_gpu_state  
> *error)
>  	struct intel_uc *uc = &i915->gt.uc;
> 	/* Capturing uC state won't be useful if there is no GuC */
> -	if (!error->device_info.has_guc)
> +	if (!error->device_info.has_uc)
>  		return;
> 	error_uc->guc_fw = uc->guc.fw;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> index 11c73af92597..0b2351a6c490 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c
> @@ -4766,7 +4766,7 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private  
> *dev_priv)
>  		dev_priv->l3_parity.remap_info[i] = NULL;
> 	/* pre-gen11 the guc irqs bits are in the upper 16 bits of the pm reg */
> -	if (HAS_GUC_SCHED(dev_priv) && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
> +	if (HAS_UC(dev_priv) && INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) < 11)
>  		dev_priv->gt.pm_guc_events = GUC_INTR_GUC2HOST << 16;
> 	/* Let's track the enabled rps events */
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> index 40076ba431d4..b5ece92683fd 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c
> @@ -595,7 +595,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info  
> intel_cherryview_info = {
>  	GEN9_DEFAULT_PAGE_SIZES, \
>  	.has_logical_ring_preemption = 1, \
>  	.display.has_csr = 1, \
> -	.has_guc = 1, \
> +	.has_uc = 1, \
>  	.display.has_ipc = 1, \
>  	.ddb_size = 896
> @@ -647,7 +647,7 @@ static const struct intel_device_info  
> intel_skylake_gt4_info = {
>  	.display.has_dp_mst = 1, \
>  	.has_logical_ring_contexts = 1, \
>  	.has_logical_ring_preemption = 1, \
> -	.has_guc = 1, \
> +	.has_uc = 1, \
>  	.ppgtt_type = INTEL_PPGTT_FULL, \
>  	.ppgtt_size = 48, \
>  	.has_reset_engine = 1, \
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> index 45a9badc9b8e..99e5b22e26f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_device_info.h
> @@ -112,7 +112,6 @@ enum intel_ppgtt_type {
>  	func(gpu_reset_clobbers_display); \
>  	func(has_reset_engine); \
>  	func(has_fpga_dbg); \
> -	func(has_guc); \
>  	func(has_l3_dpf); \
>  	func(has_llc); \
>  	func(has_logical_ring_contexts); \
> @@ -124,6 +123,7 @@ enum intel_ppgtt_type {
>  	func(has_rps); \
>  	func(has_runtime_pm); \
>  	func(has_snoop); \
> +	func(has_uc); \
>  	func(has_coherent_ggtt); \
>  	func(unfenced_needs_alignment); \
>  	func(hws_needs_physical);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> index 22472f2bd31b..53ef862731f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c
> @@ -7162,7 +7162,7 @@ static void gen11_enable_rc6(struct  
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
>  		I915_WRITE(RING_MAX_IDLE(engine->mmio_base), 10);
> -	if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +	if (HAS_UC(dev_priv))
>  		I915_WRITE(GUC_MAX_IDLE_COUNT, 0xA);
> 	I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_SLEEP, 0);
> @@ -7243,7 +7243,7 @@ static void gen9_enable_rc6(struct  
> drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	for_each_engine(engine, dev_priv, id)
>  		I915_WRITE(RING_MAX_IDLE(engine->mmio_base), 10);
> -	if (HAS_GUC(dev_priv))
> +	if (HAS_UC(dev_priv))
>  		I915_WRITE(GUC_MAX_IDLE_COUNT, 0xA);
> 	I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_SLEEP, 0);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c  
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> index fafd4e6a1147..c966d572b0c4 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
> @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ void intel_wopcm_init_early(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *i915 = wopcm_to_i915(wopcm);
> -	if (!HAS_GUC(i915))
> +	if (!HAS_UC(i915))
>  		return;
> 	if (INTEL_GEN(i915) >= 11)
> @@ -263,7 +263,7 @@ int intel_wopcm_init_hw(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm,  
> struct intel_gt *gt)
>  	if (!USES_GUC(i915))
>  		return 0;
> -	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GUC(i915));
> +	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_UC(i915));

hmm, maybe

	#define HAS_WOPCM(i915)	HAS_GT_UC(i915)

and then

	GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_WOPCM(i915));

>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.size);
>  	GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.base);


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list