[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v1 02/11] drm: drop uapi dependency from drm_print.h

[Jani Nikula]

On Fri, 19 Jul 2019, "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig at amd.com> wrote:
> Am 18.07.19 um 18:46 schrieb Chris Wilson:
>> Quoting Sam Ravnborg (2019-07-18 17:14:58)
>>> drm_print.h used DRM_NAME - thus adding a dependency from
>>> include/drm/drm_print.h => uapi/drm/drm.h
>>>
>>> Hardcode the name "drm" to break this dependency.
>>> The idea is that there shall be a minimal dependency
>>> between include/drm/* and uapi/*
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam at ravnborg.org>
>>> Suggested-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
>>> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch>
>>> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard at bootlin.com>
>>> Cc: Sean Paul <sean at poorly.run>
>>> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>
>>> Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark at gmail.com>
>>> Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul at chromium.org>
>>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>
>>> ---
>>>   include/drm/drm_print.h | 4 +---
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_print.h b/include/drm/drm_print.h
>>> index a5d6f2f3e430..760d1bd0eaf1 100644
>>> --- a/include/drm/drm_print.h
>>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_print.h
>>> @@ -32,8 +32,6 @@
>>>   #include <linux/device.h>
>>>   #include <linux/debugfs.h>
>>>   
>>> -#include <drm/drm.h>
>>> -
>>>   /**
>>>    * DOC: print
>>>    *
>>> @@ -287,7 +285,7 @@ void drm_err(const char *format, ...);
>>>   /* Macros to make printk easier */
>>>   
>>>   #define _DRM_PRINTK(once, level, fmt, ...)                             \
>>> -       printk##once(KERN_##level "[" DRM_NAME "] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>>> +       printk##once(KERN_##level "[drm] " fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>> I guess I'm th only one who
>>
>> #undef DRM_NAME
>> #define DRM_NAME i915
>>
>> just so that I didn't have inane logs?
>>
>> One might suggest that instead of hardcoding it, follow the pr_fmt()
>> pattern and only add "[drm]" for the drm core.
>>
>> Even then it so useless (which drm driver is this message for???) that I
>> want to remove them all :(
>
> Yeah, agree. I mean it is nice if the core drm functions use a prefix 
> for debug output.
>
> But I actually don't see the point for individual drivers.

We should all migrate to the versions with device...

BR,
Jani.


>
> Christian.
>
>> -Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center