[Intel-gfx] Fixes that failed to apply to v5.3-rc2

[Jani Nikula]

The following commits have been marked as Cc: stable or fixing something
in v5.3-rc2 or earlier, but failed to cherry-pick to
drm-intel-fixes. Please see if they are worth backporting, and please do
so if they are.

Failed to cherry-pick:
18398904ca9e ("drm/i915: Only recover active engines")
092be382a260 ("drm/i915: Lift intel_engines_resume() to callers")
fff8102aaed5 ("drm/i915/execlists: Process interrupted context on reset")
6c2b0103ad92 ("drm/i915: Fix and improve MCR selection logic")

Cherry-pick fine but fail to build (*):
2a8db563311a ("drm/i915: Use maximum write flush for pwrite_gtt")


BR,
Jani.


(*)

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function ‘i915_gem_gtt_pwrite_fast’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:653:4: error: implicit declaration of function ‘intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes’; did you mean ‘i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    i915_gem_flush_ggtt_writes
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:653:39: error: ‘struct i915_address_space’ has no member named ‘gt’
    intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
                                       ^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:682:37: error: ‘struct i915_address_space’ has no member named ‘gt’
  intel_gt_flush_ggtt_writes(ggtt->vm.gt);
                                     ^


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center