[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 1/6] drm/i915/uc: move uC WOPCM setup in uc_init_hw
Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com
Tue Jul 30 21:04:49 UTC 2019
On 7/30/19 7:39 AM, Michal Wajdeczko wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2019 01:47:22 +0200, Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
> <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com> wrote:
>
>> The register we write are not WOPCM regs but uC ones related to how
>> GuC and HuC are going to use the WOPCM, so it makes logical sense
>> for them to be programmed as part of uc_init_hw. The wopcm map on the
>
> s/wopcm/WOPCM
>
>> other side is not uC-specific (although that is our main use-case), so
>> keep that separate.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio at intel.com>
>> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko at intel.com>
>> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c | 8 +---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c | 68 ---------------------------
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.h | 3 --
>> 4 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> index fafa9be1e12a..2f71f3704c46 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_uc.c
>> @@ -390,6 +390,63 @@ void intel_uc_sanitize(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> __uc_sanitize(uc);
>> }
>> +static int
>> +write_and_verify(struct intel_gt *gt,
>> + i915_reg_t reg, u32 val, u32 mask, u32 locked_bit)
>
> as this function is more 'uncore' than 'gt' I would define it as:
>
> static inline bool
> intel_uncore_write_and_verify(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
> i915_reg_t reg, u32 value,
> u32 expected_value, u32 mask)
> in intel_uncore.h
>
ok
>> +{
>> + struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
>> + u32 reg_val;
>> +
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(val & ~mask);
>> +
>> + intel_uncore_write(uncore, reg, val);
>> +
>> + reg_val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, reg);
>> +
>> + return (reg_val & mask) != (val | locked_bit) ? -EIO : 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/* Initialize and verify the uC regs related to uC positioning in
>> WOPCM */
>> +int uc_wopcm_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
>
> static int uc_init_wopcm()
>
>> +{
>> + struct intel_gt *gt = uc_to_gt(uc);
>> + struct intel_wopcm *wopcm = >->i915->wopcm;
>> + struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
>> + u32 huc_agent;
>> + u32 mask;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GT_UC(gt->i915));
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_is_using_guc(uc));
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.size);
>
> on one hand there is intel_wopcm_guc_size() that can be used here,
> but on other hand there is no intel_wopcm_guc_base ;(
>
>> + GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.base);
>> +
>> + err = write_and_verify(gt, GUC_WOPCM_SIZE, wopcm->guc.size,
>> + GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_MASK | GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_LOCKED,
>> + GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_LOCKED);
>
> hmm, as these are write-once registers, maybe we should write only once
> (not here) and only verify every time in uc_init_hw ?
>
AFAIK they don't survive deep sleep states even if they're write once,
so we do need to write them again in some occasions. We could read them
first and only write them if they're not locked, but IMO it's simpler to
just unconditionally emit the write every time.
>> + if (err)
>> + goto err_out;
>> +
>> + huc_agent = intel_uc_is_using_huc(uc) ? HUC_LOADING_AGENT_GUC : 0;
>> + mask = GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_MASK | GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_VALID | huc_agent;
>> + err = write_and_verify(gt, DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET,
>> + wopcm->guc.base | huc_agent, mask,
>> + GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_VALID);
>> + if (err)
>> + goto err_out;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> +err_out:
>> + DRM_ERROR("Failed to init WOPCM registers:\n");
>
> In commit msg you said that these are not WOPCM registers ;)
>
ops :)
>> + DRM_ERROR("DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET=%#x\n",
>> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET));
>> + DRM_ERROR("GUC_WOPCM_SIZE=%#x\n",
>> + intel_uncore_read(uncore, GUC_WOPCM_SIZE));
>
> btw, we can avoid extra read by reporting already failed write
> in intel_uncore_write_and_verify()
>
intel_uncore_write_and_verify(0 is better kept generic using a bool
return IMO. We only do the extra reads in an error path anyway, so it
shouldn't be an issue.
>> +
>> + return err;
>> +}
>> +
>> int intel_uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> {
>> struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uc_to_gt(uc)->i915;
>> @@ -402,6 +459,10 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> GEM_BUG_ON(!intel_uc_fw_supported(&guc->fw));
>> + ret = uc_wopcm_init_hw(uc);
>> + if (ret)
>> + goto out;
>
> it should be harmless to reuse existing err_out label
>
ack.
Thanks,
Daniele
>> +
>> guc_reset_interrupts(guc);
>> /* WaEnableuKernelHeaderValidFix:skl */
>> @@ -486,6 +547,7 @@ int intel_uc_init_hw(struct intel_uc *uc)
>> if (GEM_WARN_ON(ret == -EIO))
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> +out:
>> dev_err(i915->drm.dev, "GuC initialization failed %d\n", ret);
>> return ret;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> index 01dd0d1d9bf6..ae4e7cc3e3f9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
>> @@ -1239,14 +1239,8 @@ int i915_gem_init_hw(struct drm_i915_private
>> *i915)
>> goto out;
>> }
>> - ret = intel_wopcm_init_hw(&i915->wopcm, gt);
>> - if (ret) {
>> - DRM_ERROR("Enabling WOPCM failed (%d)\n", ret);
>> - goto out;
>> - }
>> -
>> /* We can't enable contexts until all firmware is loaded */
>> - ret = intel_uc_init_hw(&i915->gt.uc);
>> + ret = intel_uc_init_hw(>->uc);
>> if (ret) {
>> DRM_ERROR("Enabling uc failed (%d)\n", ret);
>> goto out;
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
>> index 0e86a9e85b49..d9973c0b0384 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.c
>> @@ -224,71 +224,3 @@ int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> -
>> -static int
>> -write_and_verify(struct intel_gt *gt,
>> - i915_reg_t reg, u32 val, u32 mask, u32 locked_bit)
>> -{
>> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
>> - u32 reg_val;
>> -
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(val & ~mask);
>> -
>> - intel_uncore_write(uncore, reg, val);
>> -
>> - reg_val = intel_uncore_read(uncore, reg);
>> -
>> - return (reg_val & mask) != (val | locked_bit) ? -EIO : 0;
>> -}
>> -
>> -/**
>> - * intel_wopcm_init_hw() - Setup GuC WOPCM registers.
>> - * @wopcm: pointer to intel_wopcm.
>> - * @gt: pointer to the containing GT
>> - *
>> - * Setup the GuC WOPCM size and offset registers with the calculated
>> values. It
>> - * will verify the register values to make sure the registers are
>> locked with
>> - * correct values.
>> - *
>> - * Return: 0 on success. -EIO if registers were locked with incorrect
>> values.
>> - */
>> -int intel_wopcm_init_hw(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm, struct intel_gt *gt)
>> -{
>> - struct drm_i915_private *i915 = wopcm_to_i915(wopcm);
>> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = gt->uncore;
>> - u32 huc_agent;
>> - u32 mask;
>> - int err;
>> -
>> - if (!USES_GUC(i915))
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(!HAS_GT_UC(i915));
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.size);
>> - GEM_BUG_ON(!wopcm->guc.base);
>> -
>> - err = write_and_verify(gt, GUC_WOPCM_SIZE, wopcm->guc.size,
>> - GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_MASK | GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_LOCKED,
>> - GUC_WOPCM_SIZE_LOCKED);
>> - if (err)
>> - goto err_out;
>> -
>> - huc_agent = USES_HUC(i915) ? HUC_LOADING_AGENT_GUC : 0;
>> - mask = GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_MASK | GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_VALID | huc_agent;
>> - err = write_and_verify(gt, DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET,
>> - wopcm->guc.base | huc_agent, mask,
>> - GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET_VALID);
>> - if (err)
>> - goto err_out;
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> -
>> -err_out:
>> - DRM_ERROR("Failed to init WOPCM registers:\n");
>> - DRM_ERROR("DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET=%#x\n",
>> - intel_uncore_read(uncore, DMA_GUC_WOPCM_OFFSET));
>> - DRM_ERROR("GUC_WOPCM_SIZE=%#x\n",
>> - intel_uncore_read(uncore, GUC_WOPCM_SIZE));
>> -
>> - return err;
>> -}
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.h
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.h
>> index 56aaed4d64ff..e1f0f66aaa44 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_wopcm.h
>> @@ -9,8 +9,6 @@
>> #include <linux/types.h>
>> -struct intel_gt;
>> -
>> /**
>> * struct intel_wopcm - Overall WOPCM info and WOPCM regions.
>> * @size: Size of overall WOPCM.
>> @@ -43,6 +41,5 @@ static inline u32 intel_wopcm_guc_size(struct
>> intel_wopcm *wopcm)
>> void intel_wopcm_init_early(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm);
>> int intel_wopcm_init(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm);
>> -int intel_wopcm_init_hw(struct intel_wopcm *wopcm, struct intel_gt *gt);
>> #endif
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list