[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_schedule: Avoid using borked engines

Vinay Belgaumkar vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com
Wed Jul 31 18:31:38 UTC 2019



On 07/29/2019 12:19 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Check for viability of store-dword before use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
>   tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c | 6 ++++--
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> index 4ccacba41..6e8466299 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> @@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static void smoketest(int fd, unsigned ring, unsigned timeout)
>   	nengine = 0;
>   	if (ring == ALL_ENGINES) {
>   		for_each_physical_engine(fd, engine)
> -			engines[nengine++] = engine;
> +			if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, engine))
> +				engines[nengine++] = engine;
>   	} else {

The gem_can_store_dword() check is already executed in the fixture for 
per engine smoketest, right?
We only need it for the smoketest-all case?

Thanks,
Vinay.

> -		engines[nengine++] = ring;
> +		if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, ring))
> +			engines[nengine++] = ring;
>   	}
>   	igt_require(nengine);
>   



More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list