[Intel-gfx] [igt-dev] [PATCH i-g-t] i915/gem_exec_schedule: Avoid using borked engines
Vinay Belgaumkar
vinay.belgaumkar at intel.com
Wed Jul 31 18:31:38 UTC 2019
On 07/29/2019 12:19 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Check for viability of store-dword before use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
> ---
> tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> index 4ccacba41..6e8466299 100644
> --- a/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> +++ b/tests/i915/gem_exec_schedule.c
> @@ -282,9 +282,11 @@ static void smoketest(int fd, unsigned ring, unsigned timeout)
> nengine = 0;
> if (ring == ALL_ENGINES) {
> for_each_physical_engine(fd, engine)
> - engines[nengine++] = engine;
> + if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, engine))
> + engines[nengine++] = engine;
> } else {
The gem_can_store_dword() check is already executed in the fixture for
per engine smoketest, right?
We only need it for the smoketest-all case?
Thanks,
Vinay.
> - engines[nengine++] = ring;
> + if (gem_can_store_dword(fd, ring))
> + engines[nengine++] = ring;
> }
> igt_require(nengine);
>
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list