[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 05/21] drm/i915: Make i915_clear_error_registers take uncore
Tvrtko Ursulin
tvrtko.ursulin at linux.intel.com
Thu Jun 6 10:29:13 UTC 2019
On 06/06/2019 10:50, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2019-06-06 10:36:23)
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>>
>> The function mostly uses uncore so make the argument reflect that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at intel.com>
>> Suggested-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c | 8 ++++----
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.h | 5 +++--
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
>> index a6ecfdc735c4..ca5c6dd28203 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.c
>> @@ -1166,10 +1166,10 @@ static void gen8_clear_engine_error_register(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
>> GEN6_RING_FAULT_REG_POSTING_READ(engine);
>> }
>>
>> -void i915_clear_error_registers(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> - intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask)
>> +void uncore_clear_error_registers(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>> + intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask)
>> {
>> - struct intel_uncore *uncore = &i915->uncore;
>> + struct drm_i915_private *i915 = uncore_to_i915(uncore);
>> u32 eir;
>>
>> if (!IS_GEN(i915, 2))
>> @@ -1253,7 +1253,7 @@ void i915_handle_error(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>>
>> if (flags & I915_ERROR_CAPTURE) {
>> i915_capture_error_state(i915, engine_mask, msg);
>> - i915_clear_error_registers(i915, engine_mask);
>> + uncore_clear_error_registers(&i915->uncore, engine_mask);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.h
>> index 4f3c1acac1a3..2c57dc6c26f7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/intel_reset.h
>> @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
>> #include <linux/srcu.h>
>>
>> #include "gt/intel_engine_types.h"
>> +#include "intel_uncore.h"
>>
>> struct drm_i915_private;
>> struct i915_request;
>> @@ -25,8 +26,8 @@ void i915_handle_error(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> const char *fmt, ...);
>> #define I915_ERROR_CAPTURE BIT(0)
>>
>> -void i915_clear_error_registers(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> - intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask);
>> +void uncore_clear_error_registers(struct intel_uncore *uncore,
>> + intel_engine_mask_t engine_mask);
>
> intel_uncore_*
>
>>
>> void i915_reset(struct drm_i915_private *i915,
>> intel_engine_mask_t stalled_mask,
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> index 84104e9cc507..0fe568cfabe0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_gtt.c
>> @@ -2358,7 +2358,7 @@ void i915_check_and_clear_faults(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>> else
>> return;
>>
>> - i915_clear_error_registers(dev_priv, ALL_ENGINES);
>> + uncore_clear_error_registers(&dev_priv->uncore, ALL_ENGINES);
>> }
>
> And honestly I would prefer just to move i915_check_and_clear_faults if
> that seems reasonable.
Move to intel_reset.c? AFAICS sounds reasonable.
Regards,
Tvrtko
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list