[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/ehl: Support HBR3 on EHL combo PHY

Matt Roper matthew.d.roper at intel.com
Thu Jun 6 17:09:42 UTC 2019


On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 09:09:08AM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 06, 2019 at 09:00:56AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 03:15:22PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:51:08PM -0700, Manasi Navare wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 05, 2019 at 02:18:32PM -0700, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > > > Unlike ICL, EHL's combo PHYs can support HBR3 data rates.  Note that
> > > > > this just extends the upper limit; we will continue to honor the max
> > > > > data rate specified in the VBT in cases where it is lower than HBR3.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Yes looks good to me.
> > > >
> > > > Reviewed-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> > > >
> > > > Manasi
> > > 
> > > Thanks for the quick review.  CI looks happy too, so pushed to dinq.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Matt
> > > 
> > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c | 1 +
> > > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > > index 24b56b2a76c8..b099a9dc28fd 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_dp.c
> > > > > @@ -332,6 +332,7 @@ static int icl_max_source_rate(struct intel_dp *intel_dp)
> > > > >  	enum port port = dig_port->base.port;
> > > > >
> > > > >  	if (intel_port_is_combophy(dev_priv, port) &&
> > > > > +	    !IS_ELKHARTLAKE(dev_priv) &&
> > 
> > I wonder if we shouldn't use IS_ICELAKE instead of !IS_ELKHARTLAKE here...
> > but it seems to late...
> 
> if we apply the principle we have been adopting of always using the last
> platform for the next one... I agree, this should be IS_ICELAKE().

Makes sense.  I assumed this was something more tied to EHL's lack of TC
ports rather than something that would necessarily be carried forward to
future platforms, but as you point out I probably shouldn't make guesses
about future platforms like that and should just follow our existing
convention of inheriting all features.  I'll send a follow-up patch to
flip this to IS_ICELAKE in a little bit.


Matt

> 
> Lucas De Marchi
> 
> > 
> > But something to remember to pay attention on any upcoming platform...
> > 
> > > > >  	    !intel_dp_is_edp(intel_dp))
> > > > >  		return 540000;
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.14.5
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Matt Roper
> > > Graphics Software Engineer
> > > IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
> > > Intel Corporation
> > > (916) 356-2795
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Intel-gfx mailing list
> > > Intel-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
> > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

-- 
Matt Roper
Graphics Software Engineer
IoTG Platform Enabling & Development
Intel Corporation
(916) 356-2795


More information about the Intel-gfx mailing list