[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 3/4] drm/i915: move more atomic plane declarations to intel_atomic_plane.h
Jani Nikula
jani.nikula at intel.com
Mon Jun 10 08:12:06 UTC 2019
On Thu, 06 Jun 2019, Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> Quoting Jani Nikula (2019-06-06 13:22:02)
>> Some function declarations in intel_drv.h were missed when
>> intel_atomic_plane.h was created.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.h | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 12 ------------
>> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.h
>> index 0a9651376d0e..24320041498d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.h
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_atomic_plane.h
>> @@ -6,7 +6,11 @@
>> #ifndef __INTEL_ATOMIC_PLANE_H__
>> #define __INTEL_ATOMIC_PLANE_H__
>>
>> +#include <linux/types.h>
>> +
>> +struct drm_crtc_state;
>> struct drm_plane;
>> +struct drm_property;
>> struct intel_atomic_state;
>> struct intel_crtc;
>> struct intel_crtc_state;
>> @@ -38,5 +42,17 @@ int intel_plane_atomic_check_with_state(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_
>> struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
>> struct intel_plane_state *intel_state);
>> +int intel_plane_atomic_get_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
>> + const struct drm_plane_state *state,
>> + struct drm_property *property,
>> + u64 *val);
>> +int intel_plane_atomic_set_property(struct drm_plane *plane,
>> + struct drm_plane_state *state,
>> + struct drm_property *property,
>> + u64 val);
>> +int intel_plane_atomic_calc_changes(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
>> + struct drm_crtc_state *crtc_state,
>> + const struct intel_plane_state *old_plane_state,
>> + struct drm_plane_state *plane_state);
>
> intel_plane_atomic vs intel_atomic_plane.h that must be hitting the ocd
> sweetspot.
Right in the nerve indeed. Something for the future.
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris at chris-wilson.co.uk>
Thanks, pushed the lot.
BR,
Jani.
--
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list