[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2 2/4] drm/i915/icl: Enable TRANSCODER PORT SYNC for tiled displays across separate ports
Maarten Lankhorst
maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com
Wed Jun 12 08:30:54 UTC 2019
Op 23-04-2019 om 17:48 schreef Manasi Navare:
> In case of tiled displays where different tiles are displayed across
> different ports, we need to synchronize the transcoders involved.
> This patch implements the transcoder port sync feature for
> synchronizing one master transcoder with one or more slave
> transcoders. This is only enbaled in slave transcoder
> and the master transcoder is unaware that it is operating
> in this mode.
> This has been tested with tiled display connected to ICL.
>
> v2:
> * Do not use RMW, just write to the register in commit (Jani N)
>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper at intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manasi Navare <manasi.d.navare at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> index 92dea2231499..81e8cb9fe221 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
> @@ -4020,6 +4020,61 @@ static void icl_set_pipe_chicken(struct intel_crtc *crtc)
> I915_WRITE(PIPE_CHICKEN(pipe), tmp);
> }
>
> +static void icl_set_transcoder_port_sync(struct intel_atomic_state *old_intel_state,
> + const struct intel_crtc_state *crtc_state)
> +{
> + struct intel_crtc *crtc = to_intel_crtc(crtc_state->base.crtc);
> + struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(crtc->base.dev);
> + struct intel_crtc_state *master_crtc_state = NULL;
> + enum transcoder master_transcoder;
> + u32 trans_ddi_func_ctl2_val;
> + u8 master_select;
> +
> + /*
> + * Port Sync Mode cannot be enabled for DP MST
> + */
> + if (intel_crtc_has_type(crtc_state, INTEL_OUTPUT_DP_MST))
> + return;
Surely we should reject this case before we get here in 1/4? This should be a WARN_ON below the !master_crtc check at most.
> + /*
> + * Configure the master select and enable Transcoder Port Sync for
> + * Slave CRTCs transcoder.
> + */
> + if (!crtc_state->master_crtc)
> + return;
> +
> + master_crtc_state = intel_atomic_get_new_crtc_state(old_intel_state,
> + crtc_state->master_crtc);
> + if (WARN_ON(!master_crtc_state))
> + return;
> +
> + master_transcoder = master_crtc_state->cpu_transcoder;
> + switch (master_transcoder) {
> + case TRANSCODER_A:
> + master_select = 1;
> + break;
> + case TRANSCODER_B:
> + master_select = 2;
> + break;
> + case TRANSCODER_C:
> + master_select = 3;
> + break;
> + case TRANSCODER_EDP:
> + default:
> + master_select = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + /* Set the master select bits for Tranascoder Port Sync */
> + trans_ddi_func_ctl2_val = (PORT_SYNC_MODE_MASTER_SELECT(master_select) &
> + PORT_SYNC_MODE_MASTER_SELECT_MASK) <<
> + PORT_SYNC_MODE_MASTER_SELECT_SHIFT;
> + /* Enable Transcoder Port Sync */
> + trans_ddi_func_ctl2_val |= PORT_SYNC_MODE_ENABLE;
> +
> + I915_WRITE(TRANS_DDI_FUNC_CTL2(crtc_state->cpu_transcoder),
> + trans_ddi_func_ctl2_val);
> +}
> +
> static void intel_update_pipe_config(const struct intel_crtc_state *old_crtc_state,
> const struct intel_crtc_state *new_crtc_state)
> {
> @@ -5971,6 +6026,9 @@ static void haswell_crtc_enable(struct intel_crtc_state *pipe_config,
> if (!transcoder_is_dsi(cpu_transcoder))
> intel_set_pipe_timings(pipe_config);
>
> + if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 11)
> + icl_set_transcoder_port_sync(old_intel_state, pipe_config);
> +
> intel_set_pipe_src_size(pipe_config);
>
> if (cpu_transcoder != TRANSCODER_EDP &&
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list