[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] gpu/drm/i915: globally replace dev_priv with i915
Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demarchi at intel.com
Thu Jun 13 16:29:48 UTC 2019
On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 04:12:37PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi at intel.com> wrote:
>> We are slowly converting dev_priv to i915 everywhere, spread into
>> smaller series. While this is good to avoid unrelated breakages to other
>> inflight patches, it's bad because inflight patches on nearby paths keep
>> breaking. Paired with other code moves and refactores this is becoming a
>> nightmare.
>>
>> Now that I915_{READ,WRITE} are gone and implicit access to dev_priv no
>> longer exists we can simply sed all files and be done with the
>> conversion. This was generated with the following commands with no
>> additional fixups:
>>
>> git ls-files --full-name -z -- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/ | \
>> xargs -0 sed -i 's/\bdev_priv\b/i915/g'
>>
>> Any pending series can apply the same search and replace when rebasing.
>
>I'm pretty strongly against renaming the implicit dev_priv local
>variable before we've gotten rid of it. Renaming s/dev_priv/i915/ upon
>converting a function to not use the implicit dev_priv helps us by
>catching any leftover references.
I don't think this is strong enough reason to block the conversion. The
conversion is taking forever and is gonna take year+ if it continues at
this pace. It affects multiple developers rebasing their work and
introduce bugs on pending series.
Removing any file-scope reference (I didn't review yet if we still have
any) and reviewing the macros is sufficient. And if we later we find out
we missed one, we just go and fix it. I see zero advantage on slow and
forever. You have a mixed code base and new code following what's around
will just propagate more the mixed code base :(
Lucas De Marchi
>
>BR,
>Jani.
>
>
>--
>Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list