[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 48/59] drm/vgem: Ditch attach trickery in the fence ioctl
Daniel Vetter
daniel.vetter at ffwll.ch
Fri Jun 14 20:36:04 UTC 2019
It looks like this was done purely to get a consistent place to look
up the reservation object pointer. With the drm_prime.c helper code
now also setting gem_object->resv for imported objects we can just use
that pointer directly, instead of first ensuring a dma-buf exists.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_fence.c | 22 +---------------------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_fence.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_fence.c
index 72d43d5ec5ab..08997fdd3ccb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_fence.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vgem/vgem_fence.c
@@ -100,22 +100,6 @@ static struct dma_fence *vgem_fence_create(struct vgem_file *vfile,
return &fence->base;
}
-static int attach_dmabuf(struct drm_device *dev,
- struct drm_gem_object *obj)
-{
- struct dma_buf *dmabuf;
-
- if (obj->dma_buf)
- return 0;
-
- dmabuf = dev->driver->gem_prime_export(obj, 0);
- if (IS_ERR(dmabuf))
- return PTR_ERR(dmabuf);
-
- obj->dma_buf = dmabuf;
- return 0;
-}
-
/*
* vgem_fence_attach_ioctl (DRM_IOCTL_VGEM_FENCE_ATTACH):
*
@@ -157,10 +141,6 @@ int vgem_fence_attach_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
if (!obj)
return -ENOENT;
- ret = attach_dmabuf(dev, obj);
- if (ret)
- goto err;
-
fence = vgem_fence_create(vfile, arg->flags);
if (!fence) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
@@ -168,7 +148,7 @@ int vgem_fence_attach_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
}
/* Check for a conflicting fence */
- resv = obj->dma_buf->resv;
+ resv = obj->resv;
if (!reservation_object_test_signaled_rcu(resv,
arg->flags & VGEM_FENCE_WRITE)) {
ret = -EBUSY;
--
2.20.1
More information about the Intel-gfx
mailing list