[Intel-gfx] [RESEND PATCH v2 1/2] drm/dp/mst: Reprobe EDID for MST ports on resume

[Lyude Paul]

uh, Sasha not sure if you're a bot or not but this patch isn't even upstream

On Fri, 2019-06-14 at 21:56 +0000, Sasha Levin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [This is an automated email]
> 
> This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag.
> The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all
> 
> The bot has tested the following trees: v5.1.9, v4.19.50, v4.14.125,
> v4.9.181, v4.4.181.
> 
> v5.1.9: Build failed! Errors:
>     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:2672:9: error: implicit
> declaration of function ‘drm_dp_get_validated_port_ref’; did you mean
> ‘drm_mode_validate_driver’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:2676:9: error: implicit
> declaration of function ‘drm_dp_get_validated_mstb_ref’; did you mean
> ‘drm_mode_validate_size’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:2684:3: error: implicit
> declaration of function ‘drm_dp_put_mst_branch_device’; did you mean
> ‘drm_dp_get_mst_branch_device’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>     drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c:2715:2: error: implicit
> declaration of function ‘drm_dp_put_port’; did you mean ‘drm_dp_get_port’?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 
> v4.19.50: Build OK!
> v4.14.125: Build OK!
> v4.9.181: Build OK!
> v4.4.181: Build OK!
> 
> How should we proceed with this patch?
> 
> --
> Thanks,
> Sasha
-- 
Cheers,
	Lyude Paul